Find the electric field strength inside a solid sphere.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the electric field strength at various distances from the center of a uniformly charged solid sphere with a radius of 25 cm and a total charge of 14 µC. The discussion centers around the application of Gauss's Law and the correct interpretation of electric field equations within and outside the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between electric field strength and distance from the center of the sphere, questioning the use of the formula E = (kq)/r^2 inside the sphere. They discuss the need for Gauss's Law to find the electric field strength and consider the charge enclosed within a Gaussian surface.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using Gauss's Law and calculating charge density. There is an ongoing exploration of how to determine the charge enclosed at different distances, with multiple interpretations of the problem being discussed. Participants express uncertainty about the calculations and seek clarification on the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the uniform distribution of charge and the implications for calculating charge density. There is a focus on the volume enclosed by Gaussian surfaces at specified distances, which affects the calculations of electric field strength.

_F_
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid sphere 25cm in radius carries 14uC, distributed uniformly throughout its volume. Find the electric field strength (a.) 15cm, (b.) 25cm, (c.) 50cm from the sphere's center.

R = .25m
Q = 14 * 10^-6 C

Homework Equations


p = q/(volume)
E = (kq)/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


a.) I have absolutely no idea where to even begin here. This is what I really need help with. I'm not sure if the answer relates to the other two distances, so i'll show how I got those. For some reason, E = (kq)/r^2 fails here.

b.) E = (kq)/r^2 = (9.0*10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(14*10^-6 C)/(.25m)^2 = 2.02 * 10^-6 N/C

c.) E = (kq)/r^2 = (9.0*10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(14*10^-6 C)/(.50m)^2 = 504 * 10^3 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field inside a uniformly charged sphere is not kq/r^2. To determine the actual relationship, the easiest way is to use Gauss's Law. Are you familiar with Gauss's law?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
The field inside a uniformly charged sphere is not kq/r^2. To determine the actual relationship, the easiest way is to use Gauss's Law. Are you familiar with Gauss's law?

Yes I am familiar with Gauss's Law.

flux = integral(EAcos(theta)) = q_enclosed/e_0.

I'm still not sure where to go from here, though.
 
What is Q_{enclosed} at r= 15cm?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
What is Q_{enclosed} at r= 15cm?

I know its not 14uC. It must be something else, but I can't seem to figure out what.

Q = (e_0)*E*A ?

A = 4(pi)r^2 = 4(pi)(.15m)^2 = .2827m^2 ?
 
Well the 14uC is distributed uniformly throughout the sphere, so what is the charge density of the sphere then?
 
I would say Q/A = 14*10^-6 C * .2827 m^2 = 5*10^-5 C/m^2

But plugging that into: E = (5*10^-5 C/m^2)/e_0 = 5.59*10^6 N/C.

But my book says E = 1.21 MN/C
 
Last edited:
Can anyone point me in the right direction here?

I still can't wrap my head around this. :(If the charge density is p = q/volume. Then p = (14*10^-6 C)/(4/3*pi*(.25m)^2 = 2.14*10^-4 C/m^3

But how do I use this?
 
Well, Q_{enclosed} is the charge enclosed by your Gaussian surface. For part (a), the Gaussian surface does not enclose the entire volume; and so it does not enclose the entire charge. What volume is enclosed for r=15cm? Shouldn't the charge enclosed be that volume times the density that you just calculated?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
13K