MHB Find the equation of parabola with vertex (2, 1) and focus (1, -1)

sagarsoni7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello friends. This is my first post. I am given the following problem:

Find the equation of parabola with vertex (2, 1) and focus (1, -1)

I have tried to solve this question in this way:

Since vertex is mid point of Focus and the point which touches the Directrix. From this, I calculate that point which touches the directrix and it came out to be (3, 3). From this I got equation of directrix to be y-3=0. Now let any point (x, y) on parabola. Now distance from focus to this point and the perpendicular distance of this point from directrix will be equal. From this I got the equation: x^2 - 2x -4y + 11 =0. But answer given is: 4 x^2 + y^2 - 4xy +8x+ 46y -71=0. Please tell me where is my mistake? If you have any other method to solve this question, please share. Thanks in advance.

Sagar Soni
Class 11th Student
India
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, sagarsoni7! (Wave)

I have added the problem statement to the body of your post so that it is more clear to those reading. :D

Now, I think your method is good, but you have made an error in calculating the equation of the directrix.

It will pass through the point $(3,3)$ and be perpendicular to the axis of symmetry, which will pass through the focus and the vertex. Can you find the slope of the directrix from this? And then use this slope and the point we found to determine the equation of the directrix?
 
MarkFL said:
Hello and welcome to MHB, sagarsoni7! (Wave)

I have added the problem statement to the body of your post so that it is more clear to those reading. :D

Now, I think your method is good, but you have made an error in calculating the equation of the directrix.

It will pass through the point $(3,3)$ and be perpendicular to the axis of symmetry, which will pass through the focus and the vertex. Can you find the slope of the directrix from this? And then use this slope and the point we found to determine the equation of the directrix?

Thanks mate. You were right. Now I have solved the problem.
 
For the benefit of others who might search for the solution to this type of problem, I thought I would post a method for getting the solution.

First, we find the slope $m$ of the axis of symmetry:

$$m=\frac{1-(-1)}{2-1}=2$$

Thus, the directrix, being perpendicular to the axis of symmetry will have a slope of $$-\frac{1}{2}$$

We know the directrix passes through the point $(3,3)$, and so using the point-slope formula, we can find the equation of the directrix as follows:

$$y-3=-\frac{1}{2}(x-3)$$

Arranging this in slope-intercept form, we obtain:

$$y=-\frac{1}{2}x+\frac{9}{2}$$

Now, the parabola we are seeking will, by definition, be the locus of points equidistant from the directrix and the focus. And so using the formulas for the distance between two points and between a point and a line, we may write:

$$(x-1)^2+(y+1)^2=\frac{\left(-\frac{1}{2}x+\frac{9}{2}-y\right)^2}{\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)^2+1}$$

$$(x-1)^2+(y+1)^2=\frac{\left(9-x-2y\right)^2}{5}$$

$$5x^2-10x+5+5y^2+10y+5=x^2+4xy-18x+4y^2-36y+81$$

$$4x^2+y^2-4xy+8x+46y-71=0$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top