Find the function that matches the equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter YoungPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Polynomial
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a function \( f(x) \) that satisfies the equation \( 3f(x) + 2f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = x \). The context is centered around functional equations and potentially inverse functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the form of the function \( f(x) \) and consider its highest order term. There are suggestions to substitute \( \frac{1}{x} \) into the equation and to explore different forms of \( f(x) \). Some participants propose equating coefficients after substituting specific forms of \( f(x) \) into the original equation.

Discussion Status

Multiple approaches are being explored, including direct substitution and the use of simultaneous equations derived from evaluating the original equation at \( \frac{1}{x} \). Some participants express uncertainty about specific steps in the algebraic manipulation, while others provide clarifications and hints to guide the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for careful handling of terms that arise from substituting \( \frac{1}{x} \) and ensuring that terms cancel appropriately. Participants note the importance of considering the implications of the function's form on the overall equation.

YoungPhysicist
Insights Author
Messages
350
Reaction score
203

Homework Statement


##3f(x)+2f(\frac{1}{x}) = x##, solve ##f(x)##

Homework Equations


Not sure.Maybe the ones of inverse functions.

The Attempt at a Solution


The only thing that I came up so far is that the function’s highest order term is ##x## because if there are higher orders,it will show up at the right side of the equation.

Then I am stuck. The question is after inverse functions, so maybe it has something to do with that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it. When you have ##f(1/x)##, any resulting term not in the form of ##x## must cancel out with a term that comes from ##f(x)##.
 
If you're guessing that ##f(x)## is of the form ##f(x) = ax + b## then ##f(1/x) = (a/x) + b##. Plug those into the equation, equate coefficients of each power of ##x## and see where that gets you. I don't think it will get you very far, I think you'll find it's a contradiction. But I highly recommend doing it anyway to get used to the algebra of how you're going to attack this.

Now try a different form of ##f(x)##, and do the same thing. Write down the expression for ##f(1/x)##. Plug them in. Solve for free parameters. See if you get a solution.

@DrClaude has given you a big hint. The reason that form above won't work is that there's nothing to cancel out the ##a/x## term on the left. So what can you do about that?
 
Young physicist said:

Homework Statement


##3f(x)+2f(\frac{1}{x}) = x##, solve ##f(x)##

Homework Equations


Not sure.Maybe the ones of inverse functions.

The Attempt at a Solution


The only thing that I came up so far is that the function’s highest order term is ##x## because if there are higher orders,it will show up at the right side of the equation.

Then I am stuck. The question is after inverse functions, so maybe it has something to do with that.
Substitute ##1/x## for ##x## and see what that gets you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: archaic, epenguin, RPinPA and 2 others
OK. I think I got it.
Since the terms other than ##x## cancels out, and term ##x## reversed is ##1/x##, so there must be a ##1/x## term.

##f(x) = ax + b/x##

When I substitute that back, I get: ##3ax+\frac{3b}{x}+\frac{2a}{x}+2bx = x##
From that I can get the simultaneous equation:

##3a+2b-1 = 0##
##3b+2a = 0##

The solution of that is ##a = 3/5, b = -2/5##

So the function is:

$$f(x) = \frac{3}{5}x - \frac{2}{5x}$$

I put that in geogebra, and looks like it is correct.Thanks everyone!:smile::wink:
Edit: Oh, and ##x \ne 0##.
 
Last edited:
Yep, that's what I was thinking. But @SammyS had an elegant suggestion which doesn't require you to make an initial guess on the form of ##f(x)##.

For any nonzero ##x##, ##3f(x) + 2f(\frac 1 x) = x##.
But by evaluating at ##\frac 1 x## you must also have ##3f(\frac 1 x) + 2f(x) = \frac 1 x##.
That gives you simultaneous equations for ##f(x)## and ##f(\frac 1 x)##.

Eliminating ##f(\frac 1 x)## by multiplying by appropriate constants and subtracting:
##3 \left [3 f(x) + 2 f(\frac 1 x) \right ] - 2\left [ 3f(\frac 1 x) + 2 f(x) \right ] = 3x - 2\left (\frac 1 x \right ) ##
## 9f(x) - 4 f(x) = 5 f(x) = 3x - \frac 2 x ##
## f(x) = \frac {3x} 5 - \frac 2 {5x}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and YoungPhysicist
RPinPA said:
Eliminating ##f(\frac 1 x)## by multiplying by appropriate constants and subtracting:
Ah,Sorry @RPinPA , I don't quite get this part.
 
Young physicist said:
Ah,Sorry @RPinPA , I don't quite get this part.
@RPinPA is solving a system of two equations in two unknowns, with the unknowns being f(x) and f(1/x).

If you have
ax + by = c and
dx + ey = f

you can eliminate the y terms by multiplying the first equation by -e and the second equation by b, and then adding the two equations.

This gives you
-aex - bey = -ce
bcx + bey = bf

If you add these equations, you get a single equation in x only.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
Mark44 said:
@RPinPA is solving a system of two equations in two unknowns, with the unknowns being f(x) and f(1/x).

If you have
ax + by = c and
dx + ey = f

you can eliminate the y terms by multiplying the first equation by -e and the second equation by b, and then adding the two equations.

This gives you
-aex - bey = -ce
bcx + bey = bf

If you add these equations, you get a single equation in x only.
Oh.I see.Just not very used to simultaneous equation with functions being the variable.That kind of distracts me from treating it normally:-p.

Thanks!
 
  • #10
Young physicist said:
Ah,Sorry @RPinPA , I don't quite get this part.
Sorry, I meant "multiply the first equation by 3 and the second equation by 2 and then subtract".
I thought that was clear since that's exactly what I did on the very next line. And you can see that equation and see that ##f(\frac 1 x)## goes away.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K