MHB Find the General Expression for a Linear Transformation

Leanna
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6275

I don't quite get this question, how is it done ?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0148.PNG
    IMG_0148.PNG
    26.7 KB · Views: 114
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Leanna,

It is asking you to compute the matrix product $$\begin{pmatrix}-1&-2&0&1\\0&3&1&1\\2&0&2&-4\\0&-1&0&0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}r\\s\\t\\u\end{pmatrix}$$
 
Can you see if answer to first question is (-r, 3s, 2t, u)?

Or is it
Idk how to use latex but it's one matrix
(-r -2s+u)
(3s+t+u)
(2r+2t-4u)
(. -s. )
 
Leanna said:
Can you see if answer to first question is (-r, 3s, 2t, u)?

Or is it
Idk how to use latex but it's one matrix
(-r -2s+u)
(3s+t+u)
(2r+2t-4u)
(. -s. )

According to an online matrix calculator I found:

$$\left(\begin{array}{c}-1 & -2 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 3 & 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 0 & 2 & -4 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}r \\ s \\ t \\ u \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-r-2s+u \\ 3s+t+u \\ 2r+2t-4u \\ -s \end{array}\right)\quad\checkmark$$
 
Thanks a lot
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K