Find the intensity as function of y (interference between two propagating waves)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the intensity of interference between a spherical wave and a plane wave at a flat screen. The derived expression for intensity includes a cosine term, leading to confusion about whether the cosine should be squared. Participants agree that the intensity expression should not yield negative values, indicating a potential error in the book's solution. After reviewing the calculations, one contributor realizes they overlooked the square in their own answer, suggesting that the book's answer may indeed be incorrect. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the need for verification of the intensity formula.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Let a spherical wave propagate from the origin, $y = ADcos(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)/r$. Also, let a plane wave propagate parallel to the x axis, $y = Acos(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)$. At x = D there is a flat screen perpendicular to the x axis. Find the interference at the point y on the screen as function of the interference at y=0.$$ E = (A e^{i(wt-2\pi D/ \lambda)} + AD/r e^{i(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)} ) $$

$$ I = Q* (A^2 + (AD/r )^2 + 2AD*A/r cos{(2\pi D/ \lambda -2\pi r/ \lambda)} ) $$
Now, i pretend to use $$r \approx D$$ outside the cos, and $$r = \sqrt{ D^2 + y^2} \approx D(1+(y^2)/(2*D^2))$$ inside it.
So that $$ I = Q* (A^2 + A^2 + 2A^2 cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))} ) = 2A^2(1+cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))}) = 4A^2cos(\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda) = I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(2D \lambda)) $$

THe problem is that the solutions is ##I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(D \lambda)) ## And i have no idea where is my mistake.
 

Attachments

  • m.png
    m.png
    4 KB · Views: 131
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
$$2A^2(1+cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))}) = 4A^2cos(\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda) $$
Shouldn't the cosine function be squared on the right-hand side?

Otherwise, your work looks correct to me. In particular, I think the factor of 2 in the denominator of the argument of the cosine function is correct.
Herculi said:
THe problem is that the solutions is ##I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(D \lambda)) ## And i have no idea where is my mistake.
Did they have a square on the cosine function? If not, it is clearly wrong since the intensity cannot ever be negative.
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
TSny said:
Shouldn't the cosine function be squared on the right-hand side?

Otherwise, your work looks correct to me. In particular, I think the factor of 2 in the denominator of the argument of the cosine function is correct.

Did they have a square on the cosine function? If not, it is clearly wrong since the intensity cannot ever be negative.
Yes, i forgot the square in both answer. Thank you, so aparenttly the answer given by the book is wrong in fact.
 
Herculi said:
Thank you, so aparenttly the answer given by the book is wrong in fact.
It appears that way to me. Maybe someone else will confirm it.
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K