Find the intensity as function of y (interference between two propagating waves)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the intensity of interference between a spherical wave and a plane wave, represented by the equations $y = AD\cos(wt - 2\pi r/\lambda)/r$ and $y = A\cos(wt - 2\pi r/\lambda)$, respectively. The derived intensity expression is $I = Q*(A^2 + (AD/r)^2 + 2AD*A/r \cos(2\pi D/\lambda - 2\pi r/\lambda))$. The user identifies an error in their calculations, realizing that the correct intensity should be $I_o \cos(\pi (y^2)/(D \lambda))$, which requires squaring the cosine function. The consensus is that the original book solution is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and interference patterns
  • Familiarity with spherical and plane wave propagation
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their application in physics
  • Basic principles of intensity in wave mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of intensity in wave interference using the principle of superposition
  • Explore the implications of squaring trigonometric functions in wave intensity calculations
  • Learn about the differences between spherical and plane waves in various contexts
  • Investigate common errors in wave interference problems and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to wave interference and intensity calculations.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Let a spherical wave propagate from the origin, $y = ADcos(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)/r$. Also, let a plane wave propagate parallel to the x axis, $y = Acos(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)$. At x = D there is a flat screen perpendicular to the x axis. Find the interference at the point y on the screen as function of the interference at y=0.$$ E = (A e^{i(wt-2\pi D/ \lambda)} + AD/r e^{i(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)} ) $$

$$ I = Q* (A^2 + (AD/r )^2 + 2AD*A/r cos{(2\pi D/ \lambda -2\pi r/ \lambda)} ) $$
Now, i pretend to use $$r \approx D$$ outside the cos, and $$r = \sqrt{ D^2 + y^2} \approx D(1+(y^2)/(2*D^2))$$ inside it.
So that $$ I = Q* (A^2 + A^2 + 2A^2 cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))} ) = 2A^2(1+cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))}) = 4A^2cos(\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda) = I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(2D \lambda)) $$

THe problem is that the solutions is ##I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(D \lambda)) ## And i have no idea where is my mistake.
 

Attachments

  • m.png
    m.png
    4 KB · Views: 142
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
$$2A^2(1+cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))}) = 4A^2cos(\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda) $$
Shouldn't the cosine function be squared on the right-hand side?

Otherwise, your work looks correct to me. In particular, I think the factor of 2 in the denominator of the argument of the cosine function is correct.
Herculi said:
THe problem is that the solutions is ##I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(D \lambda)) ## And i have no idea where is my mistake.
Did they have a square on the cosine function? If not, it is clearly wrong since the intensity cannot ever be negative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
TSny said:
Shouldn't the cosine function be squared on the right-hand side?

Otherwise, your work looks correct to me. In particular, I think the factor of 2 in the denominator of the argument of the cosine function is correct.

Did they have a square on the cosine function? If not, it is clearly wrong since the intensity cannot ever be negative.
Yes, i forgot the square in both answer. Thank you, so aparenttly the answer given by the book is wrong in fact.
 
Herculi said:
Thank you, so aparenttly the answer given by the book is wrong in fact.
It appears that way to me. Maybe someone else will confirm it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K