MHB Find the maximal number of subsets, k.

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subsets
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Let $A_1, A_2, … , A_k$ be distinct subsets of $\left \{ 1,2,...,2018 \right \}$,

such that for each $1 \leq i < j \leq k$ the intersection $A_i \cap A_j$ forms an arithmetic progression.

Find the maximal value of $k$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here´s the suggested solution:

The answer is: $\binom{2018}{0}+\binom{2018}{1}+\binom{2018}{2}+\binom{2018}{3}.$
It can be readily seen, that the collection of all subsets having at most $3$ elements satisfies the conditions.

In order to complete the solution, we show, that the number of subsets having at least $3$ elements is not greater than $\binom{2018}{3}$.
Consider any subset $A = \left \{a_1,a_2,…,a_n \right \}$ having at least $3$ elements and let $a_1<a_2<…<a_n$. We assign a label $L(A) = (a_1, a_2,c)$ to each such subset, where

if $A$ is an arithmetic progression then $c = a_n.$

if not then $c$ is the first element breaking arithmetic progression $(a_1,a_2,…)$.

For example if $A = \left \{3,6,9,12,19,29 \right \}$ then $L(A) = \left \{ 3,6,19 \right \}.$

Now note, that different $3$ or more element sets have different labels, and therefore there are at most $\binom{2018}{3}$. Done.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top