MHB Find the Modulus & Argument of \(wz\)

AI Thread Summary
The complex numbers \(w\) and \(z\) have been expressed in Cartesian form as \(w = -1 - i\) and \(z = 1 - i\sqrt{3}\). Their product \(wz\) results in \((-1 - \sqrt{3}) + i(-1 + \sqrt{3})\). The modulus of \(wz\) is calculated as \(\sqrt{(-1 - \sqrt{3})^2 + (-1 + \sqrt{3})^2}\), yielding a specific value. The argument can be determined using the arctangent function based on the real and imaginary parts, leading to the exact angle for \(wz\). This process illustrates the multiplication of complex numbers and the conversion between polar and Cartesian forms.
Punch
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
The complex number w has modulus \(\sqrt{2}\) and argument \(-\frac{3\pi}{4}\), and the complex number \(z\) has modulus \(2\) and argument \(-\frac{\pi}{3}\). Find the modulus and argument of \(wz\), giving each answer exactly.
By first expressing w and \(z\) is the form \(x+iy\), find the exact real and imaginary parts of \(wz\).
I have a problem with finding the argument of \(wz\) and expressing \(w\) and \(z\) in the form \(x+iy\)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: complex numbers

Punch said:
The complex number w has modulus \sqrt{2} and argument -\frac{3\pi}{4}, and the complex number z has modulus 2 and argument -\frac{\pi}{3}. Find the modulus and argument of wz, giving each answer exactly.
By first expressing w and z is the form x+iy, find the exact real and imaginary parts of wz.
I have a problem with finding the argument of wz and expressing w and z in the form x+iy
Review how to multiply two complex numbers when they are written in polar form.

z = r cis(theta). You need to review polar form.
 
Punch said:
The complex number w has modulus \(\sqrt{2}\) and argument \(-\frac{3\pi}{4}\), and the complex number \(z\) has modulus \(2\) and argument \(-\frac{\pi}{3}\). Find the modulus and argument of \(wz\), giving each answer exactly.
By first expressing w and \(z\) is the form \(x+iy\), find the exact real and imaginary parts of \(wz\).
I have a problem with finding the argument of \(wz\) and expressing \(w\) and \(z\) in the form \(x+iy\)

If you need to solve this problem by converting to Cartesians, then

\[ \displaystyle \begin{align*} w &= \sqrt{2}\left[\cos{\left(-\frac{3\pi}{4}\right)} + i\sin{\left(-\frac{3\pi}{4}\right)}\right] \\ &= \sqrt{2}\left(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} - \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \\ &= -1 - i \end{align*} \]

and

\[ \displaystyle \begin{align*} z &= 2\left[\cos{\left(-\frac{\pi}{3}\right)} + i\sin{\left(-\frac{\pi}{3}\right)}\right] \\ &= 2\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{i\sqrt{3}}{2} \right) \\ &= 1 - i\sqrt{3} \end{align*} \]

So multiplying them together gives...

\[ \displaystyle \begin{align*} wz &= \left(-1-i\right)\left(1-i\sqrt{3}\right) \\ &= -1 + i\sqrt{3} - i + i^2\sqrt{3} \\ &= \left(-1 - \sqrt{3}\right) + i\left(-1 + \sqrt{3}\right) \end{align*} \]Can you evaluate the modulus and argument of this complex number?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top