Find the path of a particle given a potential function.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to find the path of a particle through a potential field defined by the function \( U(x,y) = x^2 + xy + y^2 \). This leads to a set of coupled differential equations that describe the motion of the particle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss transforming the coupled differential equations into independent forms using a change of coordinates. There are attempts to combine the equations and derive new variables \( u \) and \( v \) to facilitate solving for \( x \) and \( y \).

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on manipulating the equations, suggesting methods to combine them and explore the resulting solutions. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of different frequencies derived from the solutions, with participants questioning how these affect the periodicity of the motion.

Contextual Notes

Initial conditions, including coordinates and velocity, are mentioned but not fully defined in the discussion. There is also a note about the potential complexity introduced by the relationship between the squared frequencies of the solutions.

693Janu
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
I am tasked with finding the path a particle takes through this potential field.
$$U(x,y) = x^2+xy+y^2$$
I then took the gradient, and this produced a pair of differential equations.
$$\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=\frac{1}{m}(-2x-y)$$
$$\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=\frac{1}{m}(-2y-x)$$
I have yet to encounter set of coupled differential equations in this form. It looks simple, but it has proven to be very tricky to solve.

Any thoughts? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a different set of coordinates where the differential equations become independent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 693Janu
mfb said:
There is a different set of coordinates where the differential equations become independent.
I was given initial coordinates $$(3,4)$$
 
My comment was independent of initial conditions.
 
@693Janu Your second equation should read ## d^2 y/dt^2 =... ##. And if I understood the hint by @mfb , try adding the two differential equations together. The necessary change of coordinates becomes obvious, I believe. Also, subtract one equation from the other. This will give you two sets of solvable equations, from which you can then solve for ## x ## and ## y ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 693Janu
Great advice, thank you so much. However, I have never done this discussed "change of coordinates before". I do see how after adding the two equations together I can say... let $$u=x+y$$ and that gives a nice SHM solution. But how do I extract x(t) from that answer? Or do I even need to?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
693Janu said:
Great advice, thank you so much. However, I have never done this discussed "change of coordinates before". I do see how after adding the two equations together I can say... let $$u=x+y$$ and that gives a nice SHM solution. But how do I extract x(t) from that answer? Or do I even need to?
Also subtract the two equations and let ## v=x-y ##. Solve for ## v ##. You have solutions for ## u ## and ## v ##. Solve for ## x ## and ## y ##. (This part I edited/added to my post 5, maybe after you already looked at it.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 693Janu
I had that intuition before I even read your post (personal high five), and it worked out! I have two solutions and I can now solve for Initial conditions. That's great! However, the last tricky step is finding the period. How would I find the period with two different omega values? Because I have $${w_1}^2 = 3/m $$ $${w_2}^2 = 1/m $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
693Janu said:
I had that intuition before I even read your post (personal high five), and it worked out! I have two solutions and I can now solve for Initial conditions. That's great! However, the last tricky step is finding the period. How would I find the period with two different omega values? Because I have $${w_1}^2 = 3/m $$ $${w_2}^2 = 1/m $$
Believe it would be the slower frequency, given that the x motion is a multiple (3) of the slower one (y). The motion will be periodic at the slower one=it will return to the same place at the slower rate. Did I interpret that correctly, or does ## u ## have a frequency that is 3x that of ## v ##?
 
  • #10
The squared frequencies have a a factor 3, that doesn't give a common frequency for the motion.
 
  • #11
This was fun! Thanks so much! Fantastic finish to a great weekend.
 
  • #12
Additional comment: The function ## u ## has frequency ##\omega_1=3 \omega_2 ##, where ## \omega_2 ## is the frequency of v. i.e. ## \omega=2 \pi f ##. If ## u ## and ## v ## are both periodic with this slower ## f_2 ##, then ## x ## and ## y ## will also repeat at this same frequency, because ## x=(u+v)/2 ##, and ## y=(u-v)/2 ##. The period is ## T=1/f_2=2 \pi/\omega_2 ##. ## \\ ## And additional note: The complete solution with initial coordinates will also require an initial velocity.
 
  • #13
@Charles Link: The factor 3 should appear between the squared frequencies, not between the frequencies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #14
mfb said:
@Charles Link: The factor 3 should appear between the squared frequencies, not between the frequencies.
Thank you, my mistake. That does make it a little more difficult finding the period I think. Perhaps it then becomes aperiodic.
 
  • #15
Charles Link said:
Additional comment: The function ## u ## has frequency ##\omega_1=3 \omega_2 ##, where ## \omega_2 ## is the frequency of v. i.e. ## \omega=2 \pi f ##. If ## u ## and ## v ## are both periodic with this slower ## f_2 ##, then ## x ## and ## y ## will also repeat at this same frequency, because ## x=(u+v)/2 ##, and ## y=(u-v)/2 ##. The period is ## T=1/f_2=2 \pi/\omega_2 ##. ## \\ ## And additional note: The complete solution with initial coordinates will also require an initial velocity.
Imagine that, I was given initial velocity.
 
  • #16
693Janu said:
Imagine that, I was given initial velocity.
The solutions you have should be of the form ## u=A \cos(\omega_1 t+\phi_1 ) ## and ## v=B \cos(\omega_2 t+\phi_2) ##. It remains to solve for ## A ## , ## B ##, ## \phi_1 ##, and ## \phi_2 ## from the initial conditions. Meanwhile @mfb had an important input, catching my mistake so that ## \omega_1=\sqrt{3} \omega_2 ##. My first instincts is that this thing is aperiodic, but I could be wrong.
 
  • #17
It is aperiodic as ##\sqrt{3}## is not a rational number.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K