MHB Find the radius of the small circle O_2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Radius
AI Thread Summary
The radius of the small circle O_2 is determined to be 6 units. This conclusion is reached by applying the cosine rule to a triangle formed by the circle's center and the endpoints of a baseline. The sides of the triangle are defined in relation to the radius of the green circle. The calculations involve the cosine of an angle, leading to the simplified equation that confirms the radius. The discussion also includes light-hearted commentary about avatars and imaginary concepts, but the primary focus remains on the mathematical solution.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
find the radius of the small circle O_2:
View attachment 1660
 

Attachments

  • radius of the small circle.jpg
    radius of the small circle.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 87
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: find the radius of the small circle O_2

We can draw a triangle from the left bottom corner, to the center of the small circle, to the right bottom corner.
And then split it into 2 rectangular triangles.

Let's call the radius of the small circle x.
Then the left rectangular triangle has hypotenuse (36-x) and horizontal side at the x-axis (x).
And the right rectangular triangle has hypotenuse (36+x) and horizontal side at the x-axis (36-x).

Since they share their third side, the following equation must hold (Pythagoras):
$$(36-x)^2 - x^2 = (36+x)^2 - (36-x)^2$$
$$(36+x)^2 - 2(36-x)^2 + x^2 = 0$$
$$(36^2+2\cdot 36 x +x^2) - 2(36^2-2\cdot 36 x + x^2) + x^2 = 0$$
$$6\cdot 36 x = 36^2$$
$$x = 6$$
$\blacksquare$
 
Re: find the radius of the small circle O_2

Albert said:
find the radius of the small circle O_2:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1660
[sp]
Let $r$ be the radius of the green circle. Draw the triangle whose vertices are the two ends of the red baseline and the centre of the green circle (the points labelled O, O_2 and O-1 in the diagram). The lengths of its sides are $36-r$, $36+r$ and $36$. The angle labelled $\theta$ has $\cos\theta = \dfrac r{36-r}$. The cosine rule then gives the equation $(36+r)^2 = 36^2 + (36-r)^2 -2\cdot36(36-r)\dfrac r{36-r},$ which simplifies to $r=6.$[/sp]

Edit. Yet again, ILS got there first (and I never even noticed).
 

Attachments

  • radii.jpg
    radii.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 88
Last edited:
Re: find the radius of the small circle O_2

Opalg said:
Edit. Yet again, ILS got there first (and I never even noticed).

Must be my new avatar.
Sometimes it makes me feel imaginary.
 
Re: find the radius of the small circle O_2

I like Serena said:
Must be my new avatar.
Sometimes it makes me feel imaginary.

The invisible : not recognizable neither by name nor by avatar living in his imaginary complex paradigm , just kidding (Punch) .
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top