Find the Retarding Force due to Eddy Currents

  • Thread starter Thread starter icemanhv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the retarding force due to eddy currents generated when a linear conductor moves over a conductive plate. The participants debate the validity of using formulas derived for infinite wires, noting that the conductor's finite length and the nature of eddy currents complicate the calculations. Concerns are raised about the assumptions made regarding the magnetic field and current interactions, highlighting that the conductor cannot exert a force on a field it generates itself. The complexity of modeling eddy currents is acknowledged, with suggestions that numerical methods may be necessary for accurate results. Overall, the problem is deemed poorly formulated for straightforward analytical solutions.
icemanhv
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: calculate retard force

A linear conductor of length L moves at a velocity V over a fixed conductive plate at a distance R0. Current flows through the conductor, the direction of movement of the conductor is perpendicular to the direction of current in it. Find the retard force that acts on the conductor


The equation for magnetic induction of a straight wire is
##B = \mu \cdot \frac{I}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot r}##
Depending on the angle (see picture):
##B\left(\alpha\right) = \mu \cdot \frac{I}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot \frac{{r}_{0}}{\mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right)}} = \mu \cdot \frac{\mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot I}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot {r}_{0}}##
To calculate the emf we need the vertical component of the magnetic induction vector:
##{B}_{N}\left(\alpha\right) = \mu \cdot \frac{\mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot I}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot {r}_{0}} \cdot \mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right)##
Wire current from ##\varepsilon = B \cdot l \cdot \upsilon \cdot \mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right)##:
##I = \frac{{B}_{N} \cdot l \cdot \upsilon}{R}##
where R is the resistance of a single conductor of the conductive plate, V - speed of the conductor moving over the plate.
Ampere's law for two conductors carrying current:
##F(\alpha) = \mu \cdot \frac{{I}_{1}{I}_{2}}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot r} = \mu \cdot \frac{I \cdot (\frac{\mu \cdot I \cdot \mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot \mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot l \cdot \upsilon}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot {r}_{0} \cdot R})}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot \frac{{r}_{0}}{\mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right)}} = \mu^2 \cdot I^2 \cdot \mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot \mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot l \cdot \upsilon \cdot \frac{\mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right)}{R \cdot 4 \cdot \pi^2 \cdot r^2}##
To obtain the total force, integrate from 0 to pi/2 (infinity):
##F = \frac{l \cdot \upsilon}{R} \cdot {\left(\frac{\mu \cdot I}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot {r}_{0}}\right)}^2 \cdot \underset{0}{\overset{\frac{\pi}{2}}{\int }}\mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right)\mathrm{\cos}{\left(\alpha\right)}^2d\alpha##
##F = \frac{l \cdot \upsilon}{R} \cdot {\left(\frac{\mu \cdot I}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot {r}_{0}}\right)}^2 \cdot \left(- \frac{1}{3}\right)##
This calculation gives the total force only on the right side, the magnitude of the force to the left of the center will be equal to the right side, so everything still needs to be multiplied by 2.
How correct are these calculations?
 

Attachments

  • scheme.png
    scheme.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 100
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a textbook problem?
 
icemanhv said:
Ampere's law for two conductors carrying current:
##F(\alpha) = \mu \cdot \frac{{I}_{1}{I}_{2}}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot r} = \mu \cdot \frac{I \cdot (\frac{\mu \cdot I \cdot \mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot \mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot l \cdot \upsilon}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot {r}_{0} \cdot R})}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot \frac{{r}_{0}}{\mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right)}} = \mu^2 \cdot I^2 \cdot \mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot \mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right) \cdot l \cdot \upsilon \cdot \frac{\mathrm{\cos}\left(\alpha\right)}{R \cdot 4 \cdot \pi^2 \cdot r^2}##
To obtain the total force, integrate from 0 to pi/2 (infinity):
##F = \frac{l \cdot \upsilon}{R} \cdot {\left(\frac{\mu \cdot I}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot {r}_{0}}\right)}^2 \cdot \underset{0}{\overset{\frac{\pi}{2}}{\int }}\mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right)\mathrm{\cos}{\left(\alpha\right)}^2d\alpha##
##F = \frac{l \cdot \upsilon}{R} \cdot {\left(\frac{\mu \cdot I}{2 \cdot \pi \cdot {r}_{0}}\right)}^2 \cdot \left(- \frac{1}{3}\right)##
When going from the expression for ##F(\alpha)## to the integral, where did the ##d\alpha## come from? You can't just tack it on because it is required in the integrand. Remember that the integral is a summation. What exactly is it that you are adding?

Also, I am not sure about your approach. You are using the expression for the magnetic field due to an infinite wire but you are told that the wire has finite length ##L##. Of course, to have a current you need to have a closed loop. You also assume that the eddy currents generated in the plate are infinitely long which is stretching it. All this makes me suspect that this problem is not well-formulated.
icemanhv said:
Wire current from ##\varepsilon = B \cdot l \cdot \upsilon \cdot \mathrm{\sin}\left(\alpha\right)##:
##I = \frac{{B}_{N} \cdot l \cdot \upsilon}{R}##
where R is the resistance of a single conductor of the conductive plate, V - speed of the conductor moving over the plate.
What current ##I## and what field ##B## are these? You have already treated the conductor as carrying current ##I## (presumably established by some source) and generating field ##B## at some location in the plate. The conductor cannot be subject to a force due to the a generated by itself.

You need to rethink this problem and formulate a clear method of approach.
 
nasu said:
Is this a textbook problem?
No, I myself am interested in finding out the acting force in order to find out whether it is worth pursuing other tasks. I would be grateful if you show examples of similar tasks
kuruman said:
When going from the expression for ##F(\alpha)## to the integral, where did the ##d\alpha## come from? You can't just tack it on because it is required in the integrand. Remember that the integral is a summation. What exactly is it that you are adding?
I consider the plate as a set of parallel conductors, a conductor that moves over the plate will create an EMF in the "conductors" of the plate. The force between the conductor and the set of conductors of the plate will be summed, Fresult = F(alpha1) + F(alpha2) + etc.
kuruman said:
You are using the expression for the magnetic field due to an infinite wire but you are told that the wire has finite length ##L##. Of course, to have a current you need to have a closed loop.
So far, to simplify the calculations, I have taken an infinite conductor with a current, I understand that this is not quite suitable for my task :rolleyes:
Perhaps I made a mistake in the formula for calculating the total force, because the elementary forces are directed between the conductors, and I did not take into account that the vectors are not collinear 🫣
kuruman said:
What current ##I## and what field ##B## are these? You have already treated the conductor as carrying current ##I## (presumably established by some source) and generating field ##B## at some location in the plate. The conductor cannot be subject to a force due to the a generated by itself.

You need to rethink this problem and formulate a clear method of approach.
Magnetic field B is the field that is created by a moving conductor carrying current. Current I is the current that is induced in the plate element
 
icemanhv said:
I consider the plate as a set of parallel conductors, a conductor that moves over the plate will create an EMF in the "conductors" of the plate. The force between the conductor and the set of conductors of the plate will be summed, Fresult = F(alpha1) + F(alpha2) + etc.
I understand what you consider. What I am saying is that an integral is usually a summation in which you add continuously a typical mathematical expression known as the integrand. For example, when you want to find the total distance traveled by an object moving with velocity ##v(t)##, first you write a typical element that goes in the addition (the integrand) $$dx=v(t)dt$$ and then you indicate continuous summation by writing $$\int_{x_1}^{x_2}dx=\int_{t_1}^{t_2} v(t)~dt.$$ You do not write, as you have done above, $$x_{\text{result}}=x_1+x_2+~\text{etc.}$$Here, if ##\alpha## is your variable, first you need to write an expression for ##dF## which an element of force between the moving conductor and an element of "plate conductor" located at ##\alpha## as $$dF=f(\alpha)~d\alpha,$$find an algebraic expression for ##f(\alpha)## and then integrate. However, this is unlikely to yield anything useful because your model is unrealistic as I argue below.
icemanhv said:
So far, to simplify the calculations, I have taken an infinite conductor with a current, I understand that this is not quite suitable for my task :rolleyes:
Right. Maybe it simplifies the calculations but it is totally unrealistic. Your calculation is more appropriate to long parallel insulated wires arranged in a plane. If you have a continuous conducting sheet near which a magnetic field is moving, there will be eddy currents forming closed loops not long lines of current. You will be wasting your time calculating something that is not even remotely the case. Eddy current calculations are notoriously hard to perform and usually require numerical computations.
 
icemanhv said:
No, I myself am interested in finding out the acting force in order to find out whether it is worth pursuing other tasks. I would be grateful if you show examples of similar tasks
This is what I suspected.
Unfortunately, I don't think that there is any simple model or analytical solution. The currents induced in the plate are eddy currents, not linear.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top