Find at what rate the orbit radius will grow

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the rate of growth of the orbit radius for a spacecraft utilizing a solar sail. The total energy of a mass m in a circular orbit is expressed as $$E_{total} = - \frac {GMm} {2R}$$, with the change in energy between orbits given by $$\Delta E_{total} = \frac {GMm} {2} \cdot \left( \frac 1 R_{0} - \frac 1 R \right)$$. The derived rate of change of the radius is $$\frac {dR} {dt} = \frac {8S(R_{0}) \cdot R^2_{0} \cdot A} {GMm \cdot \sqrt{1 + \frac {4C(t)} {R^2_{0}}}}$$, leading to a calculated rate of 360 m/s under specific conditions. The discussion also highlights the importance of solar sail orientation and the efficiency of energy transfer from radiation pressure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics and energy conservation principles
  • Familiarity with solar sail technology and its operational principles
  • Knowledge of gravitational force equations, specifically $$F_{G}$$ and $$F_{S}$$
  • Ability to manipulate and solve differential equations related to motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of solar sails and their impact on spacecraft trajectories
  • Study the derivation and application of the Hohmann transfer orbit
  • Learn about the conservation of momentum in the context of solar radiation pressure
  • Explore advanced orbital dynamics, focusing on elliptical orbits and energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, aerospace engineers, and students of orbital mechanics interested in spacecraft propulsion and trajectory optimization using solar sails.

  • #31
jbriggs444 said:
I came up with a different formula following a different line of reasoning and used the angle of the sail rather than the angle of its normal. But I suspect that both yield the same result and that both optimize at the same angle.

Yes, after a little behind the scenes work, both come out the same.

[I used the sine of the angle of the reflected ray (twice my alpha) to get its tangential momentum component and the sine of the angle of the mirror to get the cross section. After some trig and double angle formula evaluation, that comes to ##2 \sin^2 \alpha \cos \alpha##. The factor of two comes out of the computation of ##F_{0}##. Mine is not doubled. The ##\sin## versus ##\cos## swap comes from the choice of using sail angle rather than sail normal angle].


You can make the substitution of ##1-\sin^2 \alpha## for ##\cos^2 \alpha##. That will give you a simple polynomial in ##\sin \alpha##. You can optimize that (solve for a zero first derivative) and then take the arc sine of the result. Then plug that angle into your formula for tangential force.

You will want to solve for ##F_0## either using the figures from the solar sail article or from first principles using ##E=pc##.
I got ##F=0.3849 \cdot F_{0}## and the approach from my first post gave me formula of:
$$\dot{R} = \frac {2 \cdot 0.3849 \cdot F_{0} AR^2_{0} v} {GMm} \approx 3.5 \frac m s$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
993
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K