Find at what rate the orbit radius will grow

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rate at which the orbit radius of a spacecraft will grow when using a solar sail. The total energy of a mass in a circular orbit is analyzed, leading to a derived equation for the radius change over time. Participants explore the implications of solar sail orientation and energy transfer efficiency, emphasizing that the sail's angle affects the force exerted and thus the rate of energy transfer. There is debate over whether the orbit remains circular or becomes elliptical due to the forces involved, with some suggesting that a steady outward force will alter the orbit's shape. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of orbital mechanics and energy conservation in the context of solar sails.
  • #31
jbriggs444 said:
I came up with a different formula following a different line of reasoning and used the angle of the sail rather than the angle of its normal. But I suspect that both yield the same result and that both optimize at the same angle.

Yes, after a little behind the scenes work, both come out the same.

[I used the sine of the angle of the reflected ray (twice my alpha) to get its tangential momentum component and the sine of the angle of the mirror to get the cross section. After some trig and double angle formula evaluation, that comes to ##2 \sin^2 \alpha \cos \alpha##. The factor of two comes out of the computation of ##F_{0}##. Mine is not doubled. The ##\sin## versus ##\cos## swap comes from the choice of using sail angle rather than sail normal angle].


You can make the substitution of ##1-\sin^2 \alpha## for ##\cos^2 \alpha##. That will give you a simple polynomial in ##\sin \alpha##. You can optimize that (solve for a zero first derivative) and then take the arc sine of the result. Then plug that angle into your formula for tangential force.

You will want to solve for ##F_0## either using the figures from the solar sail article or from first principles using ##E=pc##.
I got ##F=0.3849 \cdot F_{0}## and the approach from my first post gave me formula of:
$$\dot{R} = \frac {2 \cdot 0.3849 \cdot F_{0} AR^2_{0} v} {GMm} \approx 3.5 \frac m s$$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
874
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
984
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K