MHB Find the smallest possible value 1-1/(n_1)-1/(n_2)-1/(n_3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary
The smallest possible value of the expression 1 - (1/n1) - (1/n2) - (1/n3) occurs when n1, n2, and n3 are distinct positive integers that satisfy the condition (1/n1) + (1/n2) + (1/n3) < 1. The minimum is achieved with n1 = 3, n2 = 4, and n3 = 5, resulting in a value of 13/60. The proof involves treating the sum of the fractions as a single quantity and minimizing the expression accordingly. Participants in the discussion noted the importance of distinct integers and provided corrections to previous answers. The final conclusion confirms that the minimum value is indeed 13/60.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Find, with proof, the smallest possible value of $1-\frac{1}{n_1}-\frac{1}{n_2}-\frac{1}{n_3}$

where $n_1,n_2$ and $n_3$ are different positive integers, that satisfy:$\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}+\frac{1}{n_3} < 1.$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, $1- \frac{1}{x_1}- \frac{1}{x_2}- \frac{1}{x_3}= 1- \left(\frac{1}{x_1}
+ \frac{1}{x_2}+ \frac{1}{x_3}\right)$ so we can treat $\frac{1}{x_1}
+ \frac{1}{x_2}+ \frac{1}{x_3}$ as a single quantity.

1- 3/x= (x- 3)/x is smallest when x= 3. Since $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$ have be distinct integers, $1- \frac{1}{x_1}- \frac{1}{x_2}- \frac{1}{x_3}$ will be minimum when $x_1= 3$, $x_2= 4$, and $x_3= 5$. In that case, $1- \frac{1}{x_1}- \frac{1}{x_2}- \frac{1}{x_3}= 1- \frac{1}{3}- \frac{1}{4}- \frac{1}{5}= \frac{60}{60}- \frac{20}{60}- \frac{15}{60}- \frac{12}{60}= \frac{13}{60}$
 
Hi, Country Boy
Your answer is not correct. Also please note, that any contribution should be hidden by spoiler tags. Thankyou.
 
The problem involves maximizing $\dfrac1{n_1}+\dfrac1{n_2}+\dfrac1{n_3}$. We can thus let $n_1=2$ and $n_2=3$. Then $\dfrac12+\dfrac13+\dfrac1{n_3}<1$ $\implies$ $\dfrac1{n_3}<\dfrac16$ $\implies$ $n_3=7$. So the minimum value of $1-\left(\dfrac1{n_1}+\dfrac1{n_2}+\dfrac1{n_3}\right)$ is $1-\left(\dfrac12+\dfrac13+\dfrac17\right)=\dfrac1{42}$.
 
Olinguito said:
The problem involves maximizing $\dfrac1{n_1}+\dfrac1{n_2}+\dfrac1{n_3}$. We can thus let $n_1=2$ and $n_2=3$. Then $\dfrac12+\dfrac13+\dfrac1{n_3}<1$ $\implies$ $\dfrac1{n_3}<\dfrac16$ $\implies$ $n_3=7$. So the minimum value of $1-\left(\dfrac1{n_1}+\dfrac1{n_2}+\dfrac1{n_3}\right)$ is $1-\left(\dfrac12+\dfrac13+\dfrac17\right)=\dfrac1{42}$.
You´re right, Olinguito (Yes)

Thankyou for your participation!
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
609
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K