MHB Find the value in terms of p and q

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms Value
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
If $log_a 2 = P $ & $ log_a 3 = q$ find $log_a 72 $ in terms of $p$ & $q $

I'm not sure on how to begin this may be convert the logarithms to decimals :confused:

Many Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given:

$$\log_a(2)=p$$ and $$\log_a(3)=q$$

Now, we may write:

$$\log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$$

Can you now proceed to use the properties of logs to express this in terms of $p$ and $q$?
 
MarkFL said:
We are given:

$$\log_a(2)=p$$ and $$\log_a(3)=q$$

Now, we may write:

$$\log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$$

Can you now proceed to use the properties of logs to express this in terms of $p$ and $q$?

Thank you very much MarkFL (Happy) (Party)

Then expressing this in terms of $p$ & $q$,

It would be $p=3$ & $q=2$

May I know how the power of 3 on 2 & the power of 2 on 3 get derived below in the RHS

$\displaystyle \log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$
 
mathlearn said:
Thank you very much MarkFL (Happy) (Party)

Then expressing this in terms of $p$ & $q$,

It would be $p=3$ & $q=2$

May I know how the power of 3 on 2 & the power of 2 on 3 get derived below in the RHS

$\displaystyle \log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$

No, $p$ and $q$ don't somehow change values here. We observe that by prime factorization we have:

$$72=8\cdot9=2^3\cdot3^2$$

Hence:

$$\log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$$

Now, you want to use the properties of logs, specifically:

$$\log_a(b^c)=c\cdot\log_a(b)$$

$$\log_a(bc)=\log_a(b)+\log_a(c)$$

to further simplify. What do you get?
 
MarkFL said:
No, $p$ and $q$ don't somehow change values here. We observe that by prime factorization we have:

$$72=8\cdot9=2^3\cdot3^2$$

Hence:

$$\log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$$

Now, you want to use the properties of logs, specifically:

$$\log_a(b^c)=c\cdot\log_a(b)$$

$$\log_a(bc)=\log_a(b)+\log_a(c)$$

to further simplify. What do you get?

Thank you very much MarkFL (Happy) (Party)

My apologies! for being a little late in replying,

Using the given properties of logarithms,

$\log_a72 = \log_a(2^3 \cdot 3^2)\\
=\log_a (2^3) + \log_a (3^2)\\
= 3 \log_a2 + 2\log_a3\\
= 3p + 2q$

Correct ? (Smile)
 
Yes, that looks good. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top