MHB Find the value of X in terms of Y

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms Value
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • tri_similar.jpg
    tri_similar.jpg
    112.9 KB · Views: 77
  • tri_similar2.jpg
    tri_similar2.jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 74
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
All I see is the three angles of the triangles equal.
In this case the triangles are similar.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
In this case the triangles are similar.

As said above,

In similar triangles, the sides facing the equal angles are always in the same ratio

$\frac{7}{X}$ = $\frac{9}{Y}$

$7Y$ = $9X$

Correct I guess?

Many Thanks :)
 
mathlearn said:
$7Y$ = $9X$
Correct, but the final answer is $x=7y/9$ ("find the value of $x$ in terms of $y$").

Also, in mathematics lowercase and uppercase letters often denote different objects, so they should not be mixed.
 
Sure :) Thank you for the advice :)

Many Thanks :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top