Find the volume of the solid obtained by revolving the region

  • Thread starter Thread starter iRaid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solid Volume
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the volume of a solid obtained by revolving a region bounded by the curves y=x²+1 and y=9-x² around the line y=-1. Participants are discussing their approaches and interpretations of the setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant proposes an integral for the volume but questions the inner radius calculation, suggesting it may only be accurate at a specific point. Others discuss the need to consider the outer radius and the implications of the axis of rotation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning each other's reasoning and interpretations of the problem setup. Some express concerns about the correctness of a teacher's method, particularly regarding the treatment of the axis of rotation. There is no clear consensus on the correct approach yet, but various interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the axis of rotation and how it affects the volume calculation. Participants highlight the importance of sketching the curves and understanding the geometric implications of the setup.

iRaid
Messages
558
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Alright well I think I have this right, but my teacher has it done a different way..

Find the volume of the solid obtained by revolving the region bounded by y=x2+1; y=9-x2 about y=-1.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So I thought the integral would be:
2\pi\int_{0}^{2}(9-x^{2})^{2}-(x^{2}+3)^{2}dx
I thought it was x2+3 because you have to rotate it around y=-1 so the inner radius would be 2 added to the 2nd equation.
Oh yeah and I just did the volume from 0 to 2 and multiplied by 2..

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iRaid said:

Homework Statement


Alright well I think I have this right, but my teacher has it done a different way..

Find the volume of the solid obtained by revolving the region bounded by y=x2+1; y=9-x2 about y=-1.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


So I thought the integral would be:
2\pi\int_{0}^{2}(9-x^{2})^{2}-(x^{2}+3)^{2}dx
I thought it was x2+3 because you have to rotate it around y=-1 so the inner radius would be 2 added to the 2nd equation.
Oh yeah and I just did the volume from 0 to 2 and multiplied by 2..

Thanks for any help.

That's totally misguided. The inner radius is only 2 at x=0, isn't it? Did you draw a sketch? At an arbitrary value of x the inner radius is (x^2+1)-(-1), isn't it? What's the outer radius?
 
Last edited:
y=9-x2-(-1) so 10-x2 for the outer radius?

But either way his answer is wrong he didn't even take that into account.
 
iRaid said:
y=9-x2-(-1) so 10-x2 for the outer radius?

But either way his answer is wrong he didn't even take that into account.

If that's the way your teacher did it, then it looks wrong to me. I thought you were showing the way you did it?
 
iRaid said:

Homework Statement


Alright well I think I have this right, but my teacher has it done a different way..

Find the volume of the solid obtained by revolving the region bounded by y=x2+1; y=9-x2 about y=-1.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So I thought the integral would be:
2\pi\int_{0}^{2}(9-x^{2})^{2}-(x^{2}+3)^{2}dx
I thought it was x2+3 because you have to rotate it around y=-1 so the inner radius would be 2 added to the 2nd equation.
Oh yeah and I just did the volume from 0 to 2 and multiplied by 2..

Thanks for any help.

The steps in solving these problems are very standard:

1) Sketch the curves and highlight the region of interest. Draw in the axis of rotation.

2) Write an expression for the element of volume.

3) Integrate and evaluate the definite integral.

Try going through the steps systematically.
 
Dick said:
If that's the way your teacher did it, then it looks wrong to me. I thought you were showing the way you did it?

He just subtracted the first equation (squared) from the second equation (squared).
I thought that he did something wrong with it, I don't think he took into account the y=-1 part.
 
iRaid said:
He just subtracted the first equation (squared) from the second equation (squared).
I thought that he did something wrong with it, I don't think he took into account the y=-1 part.

If he'd added one to each of the y-expressions before squaring then subtracting, then he's taken the axis into account.
 
iRaid said:
He just subtracted the first equation (squared) from the second equation (squared).
I thought that he did something wrong with it, I don't think he took into account the y=-1 part.

So what did he show? What you showed is not just subtracting the first equation squared from the second squared. You magically added two to just one of them. Why?
 
Last edited:
Curious3141 said:
If he'd added one to each of the y-expressions before squaring then subtracting, then he's taken the axis into account.

No he just left them as they are.
 
  • #10
iRaid said:
No he just left them as they are.

Then that would correspond to a rotation around y=0. I don't think that's what you want.
 
  • #11
Dick said:
Then that would correspond to a rotation around y=0. I don't think that's what you want.

Ok that's what I thought, thanks lol.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K