Find the Water Tank Height: A Homework Challenge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves determining the height of water in a tank with two holes at 0.80m and 3.6m above the floor. Using Bernoulli's equation and kinematic principles, the relationship between the exit velocities of the water streams can be established. The correct approach involves setting the distances traveled by the water from both holes equal, leading to the conclusion that the height of the water column above the top hole is 4.4m. This solution requires careful algebraic manipulation of the equations derived from Bernoulli's principle and kinematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's equation
  • Basic kinematics principles
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
  • Familiarity with projectile motion concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Bernoulli's equation in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about kinematic equations for projectile motion
  • Practice solving problems involving fluid flow through orifices
  • Explore the relationship between pressure, velocity, and height in fluid mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on fluid dynamics and kinematics, as well as educators looking for problem-solving strategies in these areas.

ruffkilla
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The water tank is open to the atmosphere and has two holes in it, one at 0.80m and the other at 3.6m above the floor on which the tank rests. if the two streams of water strike the floor in the same place, what i the depth of water in the tank.
tank height is 5 m.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i know if you find the velocities out from both holes, you can use those to determine the hieght of the water, however, when i did that i got 2.024m which in impossilbe. any help would be great. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
these are great problems--whats the source?

You have made the connection between height of water and velocity as it exits hole via Bernoullis eqn. The difference in height between the two holes can be used in kinematics problem, treat water drop as a projectile with arbitrary mass, I think. That help? Show some work and we can likely get this sorted out.
 
these problems suck balls man! i sat here for a good 3 hours trying to figure it out. but no good. man i donno how to type out the work using regular stuff. i which it had symbols on the forum. the source of these problems is my physics book. by james walker.
 
Okay, so where are you upto in this problem, what have you done thus far?
 
ruffkilla said:
these problems suck balls man! i sat here for a good 3 hours trying to figure it out. but no good. man i donno how to type out the work using regular stuff. i which it had symbols on the forum. the source of these problems is my physics book. by james walker.

you know that from Bernollis: here d=density(rho)

1/2dv^2+dgh+po=constant.

from kinematics we can obtain relation between exit velocities.

(the stream from the bottom must be going considerably faster to hit same spot). Then just slogging thru algebra in Bernoullis eqn for height,x, where
x+3.6 and x+.8 pressure difference must equal velocity squared difference.
 
.5\rho g h +P = .5\rho v1^2 + \rho g h1 + P + 5\rho v2^2 + \rho g h2 + P


this is the main equation i used to derive the velocities related to the height. but i donno if its in the right set up
 
looks good except there should be an equal sign after the middle P.

Substitute for h1=h-0.8
and for h2=h-3.6 now from the kinematics part, you can get v1=kv2
which will allow you to solve for the velocities, and then go back to eqn to compute height, h
 
ahhh... i knew the hieghts should have been h-h1 and h-h2. i tried that but i donno how u got v1 to equal kv2, i keep on getting v1^2 + g(h-.8)=v2^2 + g(h-3.6)
what am i doing wrong?
 
nothing, that's where the kinematics comes in

pretend water is arbitrary mass

x the distance it lands from tank=v0*t0
water from second hole travels same distance v1*t1

from acceleration we know 1/2g*t0^2=0.8 and 1/2 g*t1^2=3.6

and so forth.

edited to correct omission of t squared
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I had time to sit down and look at problem more in depth :rolleyes: , I think you need to set up problem using following lines:

a) v0^2=2gh
b) v1^2=2g(h+2.8)

now we need eqn relating v0 and v1, again considering kinematics

x=v1*t1=v0*t0 so (v0/v1)^2=(t1/t0)^2

from acceleration outside the tank, we know 1/2g(t0^2)=3.6

and similarly, 1/2g(t1^2)=0.8 this gives (t1/t0)^2=0.8/3.6

Divide eqn a by b and equate to .8/3.6 you should be able to solve for h, which is height of column above top hole. There may be much better method, but this seems at least reasonable, if not quickest way to get solution.
 
  • #11
The answer is 4.4 and the key is to set the d1=vt and d2=vt to each other so v1t1=v2d2 start there and see if you get that answer
 
  • #12
mike1234 said:
The answer is 4.4 and the key is to set the d1=vt and d2=vt to each other so v1t1=v2d2 start there and see if you get that answer

to OP,

Maybe it was simultaeous post, this is the approach i suggested as well 3 posts ago. Hope it wasn't too unclear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K