Find unconditional distribution using transforms

  • Thread starter Thread starter psie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability theory
psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
If ##X\mid \Sigma^2=\lambda\in N(0,1/\lambda)## with ##\Sigma ^2\in \Gamma \left(\frac{n}{2}{,}\frac{2}{n}\right)##, show that ##X\in t(n)## using transforms.
Relevant Equations
##t(n)## is the t-distribution with parameter ##n##.
I am asked to solve the challenging problem above (I don't see the purpose in this exercise actually, since transforms just make it harder I think).

Here's my attempt; denote by ##\varphi_X## the characteristic function (cf) of ##X##, then $$\varphi_X(t)=Ee^{itX}=E(E(e^{itX}\mid\Sigma^2))=Eh(\Sigma^2),$$where ##h(\lambda)=\varphi_{X\mid \Sigma^2=\lambda}(t)=e^{-t^2/(2\lambda)}##, since recall the cf of ##N(0,\sigma^2)## is just ##e^{-t^2\sigma^2/2}##. Now, $$\varphi_X(t)=Ee^{-t^2/(2\Sigma^2)}=\ldots,$$and I don't know how to proceed further. The thing is, I prefer not to take this route, since the cf of ##t(n)## is very intricate, but I guess this is the way to go, by comparing cfs, or?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's possible to solve this by comparing cfs, but it is a bit of work. What will come in handy are equations 10.32.10 and 10.32.11 here. We have $$\varphi_X(t)=E\left[e^{-t^2/(2\Sigma^2)}\right]=\frac{\left(n/2\right)^{n/2}}{\Gamma(n/2)}\int_0^\infty \exp\left(-\frac{n\lambda}{2}-\frac{t^2}{2\lambda}\right)\lambda^{n/2-1}\,d\lambda.$$ Now make a substitution so as to identify the integral representation of equation 10.32.10 given in the link. To derive the cf of the Student's ##t##-distribution with parameter ##n##, you'll need equation 10.32.11. Equation 10.32.9 in that link shows that ##K_\nu(z)=K_{-\nu}(z)##, which is also useful.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top