MHB Find vector w in terms of i and j

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the vector $\vec{w}$ in terms of unit vectors $\vec{i}$ and $\vec{j}$. Given vectors $\vec{u} = -\vec{i} + 2\vec{j}$ and $\vec{v} = 3\vec{i} + 5\vec{j}$, the calculation for $\vec{u} + 2\vec{v}$ results in $5\vec{i} + 12\vec{j}$. To find $\vec{w}$ with a magnitude of 26, it is determined that $\vec{w} = 10\vec{i} + 24\vec{j}$. Some participants clarify the calculations and acknowledge a missed negative sign in the initial steps, confirming the correctness of the final result.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
The vectors $\vec{i}$ , $\vec{j}$ are unit vectors
along the x-axis and y-axis respectively.

The vectors $ \vec{u}= –\vec{i} +2\vec{j}$ and $\vec{v} = 3\vec{i} + 5 \vec{j}$ are given.

(a) Find $\vec{u}+ 2\vec{v}$ in terms of $\vec{i}$ and $\vec{j}$ .

$–\vec{i} +2\vec{j} + 2(3\vec{i} + 5 \vec{j}) = 5\vec{i}+12\vec{j}$

A vector $\vec{w}$ has the same direction as $\vec{u} + 2\vec{v} $, and has a magnitude of $26$.

magnitude of $5\vec(i)+12\vec{j}$ is $\sqrt{5^2+12^2}=13$ which is half of $26$

(b) Find $\vec{w}$ in terms of $\vec{i}$and $\vec{j}$ .

so $\vec{w} = 2(5\vec{i}+12\vec{j}) = 10\vec{i}+24{j}$

hope so anyway??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: find vector w in terms of i and j

Your work is correct if $$\vec{v}$$ is instead given as:

$$\vec{v}=2\vec{i}+5\vec{j}$$

Otherwise, the problem needs to be reworked.
 
Re: find vector w in terms of i and j

MarkFL said:
Your work is correct if $$\vec{v}$$ is instead given as:

$$\vec{v}=2\vec{i}+5\vec{j}$$

Otherwise, the problem needs to be reworked.

this is what was given
$\displaystyle \vec{v}=3\vec{i}+5\vec{j}$

$\vec{u}+2\vec{v}= –\vec{i}+2\vec{j}+2(3\vec{i}+5\vec{j}) =5\vec{i}+12\vec{j}$
$–\vec{i}+6\vec{i}+2\vec{j}+10\vec{j}=5\vec{i}+12 \vec{j} $

this is a leading $$(-1)\vec{i}$$ which hard to see...
or did I miss something else...:confused:
 
Re: find vector w in terms of i and j

Everything you have written is correct.
 
Re: find vector w in terms of i and j

karush said:
this is what was given
$\displaystyle \vec{v}=3\vec{i}+5\vec{j}$

$\vec{u}+2\vec{v}= –\vec{i}+2\vec{j}+2(3\vec{i}+5\vec{j}) =5\vec{i}+12\vec{j}$
$–\vec{i}+6\vec{i}+2\vec{j}+10\vec{j}=5\vec{i}+12 \vec{j} $

this is a leading $$(-1)\vec{i}$$ which hard to see...
or did I miss something else...:confused:

My apologies...I somehow missed the leading negative there...(Blush)
 
Re: find vector w in terms of i and j

No prob...you are a lot more accurate than I am
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top