Find Velocity of Rod Center of Mass When Making 30° Angle with Horizontal

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a thin rigid rod that is initially vertical and begins to fall after a disturbance. Participants are tasked with finding the velocity of the center of mass of the rod when it makes a 30° angle with the horizontal, involving concepts from rotational motion and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the instantaneous axis of rotation and conservation of energy to derive expressions for the velocity of the center of mass. There are questions about the motion of the rod's ends during the fall and the implications of the center of mass falling vertically. Some participants discuss the vector representation of velocities at the ends of the rod.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing different approaches and questioning the assumptions related to the motion of the rod. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between the center of mass and the motion of the rod's ends, but no consensus has been reached on all aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of forces acting on the rod and the resulting motion, with some confusion about the direction of forces and velocities. There are references to specific angles and conditions that may affect the analysis.

Satvik Pandey
Messages
591
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


A thin rigid rod of length ##l## is placed perfectly vertical on a smooth ground. A slight disturbance on the upper end of rod causes lower end of rod to slip along the ground and rod starts falling down. Find velocity of center of mass of rod when the rod makes ##30## with horizontal.

2.Relevant equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I first tried to find the instantaneous axis of rotation--
Untitled.png


So distance of IAOR from Com of rod is ## l cos\theta /2 ##

Now by conservation of energy

##\frac { mgl(1-sin\theta ) }{ 2 } =\frac { 1 }{ 2 } \left( \frac { m{ l }^{ 2 } }{ 12 } +\frac { m{ l }^{ 2 }{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta }{ 4 } \right) { \omega }^{ 2 }##

Also ##{ V }_{ CM }=\omega \frac { lcos\theta }{ 2 } ##

From these two equations I got ##{ V }_{ CM }=\sqrt { \frac { 9gl }{ 26 } } ##

I have confusion that why the lower end of the rod started moving backward.
I know that as only vertical force mg acts on the rod so the CoM of the rod falls vertically.
But why the lower end of the rod sliped backward?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the COM falls vertically and the rod rotates how do the upper end and lower end move?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Satvik Pandey
ehild said:
If the COM falls vertically and the rod rotates how do the upper end and lower end move?

So does the lower end of the rod slipped backward in order to allow the CoM of the rod to fall vertically?
 
Satvik Pandey said:
So does the lower end of the rod slipped backward in order to allow the CoM of the rod to fall vertically?
Yes, and the upper end turns forward. You can describe the motion as the vertical falling of the COM and rotation about the COM.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Satvik Pandey
ehild said:
Yes, and the upper end turns forward. You can describe the motion as the vertical falling of the COM and rotation about the COM.

I tried to draw the line of action of the velocity of the upper end of the rod.
Untitled.png

Here the red line shows the velocity of the upper end of the rod due to rotation. The red line is perpendicular to the to the black line.

And blue line shows the velocity of upper end of the rod due to vertical fall of CoM.

And green vector is the resultant of blue and red vector.
Does green vector correctly shows the line of action of the velocity of the upper end of the rod?
 
Satvik Pandey said:
Does green vector correctly shows the line of action of the velocity of the upper end of the rod?
Yes, in principle. You get the velocity of the ends as the vector sum of the velocity of the COM and the velocity of the end of rod with respect to the COM.
 
I also solved this question without using IAOR.

By conservation of energy

##\frac{mgl(1-sin\theta)}{2}=\frac{mv^{2}}{2} + \frac{I \omega^{2}}{2}##
Untitled.png

Velocity of the lower end of the rod in vertical direction is 0

So ## V_{com}=\frac{l \omega cos\theta}{2} ##

Using these two equations I got

## V=\sqrt { \frac { 3{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta (1-sin\theta )gl }{ 3{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta +1 } } ##

Is it right?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ehild
When we have to draw the line of action of the velocity(acceleration) of the CoM of a rigid body we first shift all the forces acting on the rigidbody to its CoM and then we find the resultant of the forces. Does the line of action of velocity(acceleration) is similar to the direction of the resultant force acting on the CoM of the body?
 
Satvik Pandey said:
## V=\sqrt { \frac { 3{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta (1-sin\theta )gl }{ 3{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta +1 } } ##

Is it right?
Correct! :cool:
 
  • #10
Satvik Pandey said:
When we have to draw the line of action of the velocity(acceleration) of the CoM of a rigid body we first shift all the forces acting on the rigidbody to its CoM and then we find the resultant of the forces. Does the line of action of velocity(acceleration) is similar to the direction of the resultant force acting on the CoM of the body?

I know what is the line of action of a force but I do not know what you mean on the line of action of velocity.

In case of the motion of a rigid body in a plane, the motion is equivalent to the motion of the CoM under the effect of all the external forces, applied at the CoM, accompanied with a rotation about the CoM.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Satvik Pandey
  • #11
ehild said:
I know what is the line of action of a force but I do not know what you mean on the line of action of velocity.

In case of the motion of a rigid body in a plane, the motion is equivalent to the motion of the CoM under the effect of all the external forces, applied at the CoM, accompanied with a rotation about the CoM.

I think Line of action of velocity is not the correct word.

Suppose there is rod resting in a wedge.(as shown in figure 1). When the system is released it will took the shape somewhat similar to (figure 2)(assume all surfaces to be friction less).Suppose we are asked to find the direction in which the CoM of rod will move.
Untitled.png

I think first I have to draw the FBD of the rod.(please see figure 3)

Then I shifted all forces to the CoM of the rod.
Untitled.png

Clearly mg is greater than N2.

Does the green arrow correctly show the direction in which CoM of rod will move?

Green vector is resultant of the three forces (mg,N1,N2).
 
  • #12
N1 is wrong.
 
  • #13
ehild said:
N1 is wrong.

Oh! Its direction is wrong. It should be perpendicular to the contact surface.
Untitled.png

Does green arrow correctly shows the direction in which the CoM of the the rod will move.

Green vector is the resultant of the forces N1,N2 amd mg.
 
  • #14
I do not see why do you draw those arrows, but yes, the CoM moves downward and to the right. And I do not think that mg is smaller than N2 .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Satvik Pandey
  • #15
ehild said:
I do not see why do you draw those arrows, but yes, the CoM moves downward and to the right. And I do not think that mg is smaller than N2 .

As the CoM of the rod moves downward so mg should be greater than N2.

Does the CoM of the rod moves in the resultant of N1,N2 and mg?
 
  • #16
Satvik Pandey said:
Does the CoM of the rod moves in the resultant of N1,N2 and mg?

Yes.
 
  • #17
ehild said:
Yes.

Thank you ehild.
You are awesome.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
55
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K