MHB Find Width of Rectangle with 600yd2 and 140yd Fencing

  • Thread starter Thread starter alllove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Rectangle
alllove
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A rectangular enclosure must have an area of at least 600 yd2. If 140 yd of fencing is to be used, and the width cannot exceed the length, within what limits must the width of the enclosure lie?
Select one:
A. 35 ≤ w ≤ 60
B. 10 ≤ w ≤ 35
C. 10 ≤ w ≤ 60
D. 0 ≤ w ≤ 10
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
length, $L$ and width $(70-L)$

constraints ...

$70-L \le L$

$L(70-L) \ge 600$

see what you can do from here
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since the problem specifically asks about "w", the width, I would, instead, say that $(70- w)w\ge 600$.

Of course that's exactly the same as the inequality skeeter gave for L. There will be two solutions. It is the condition that "the width cannot exceed the length" that allows you to distinguish between them.
 
Width being less than square root of 600 I see that it is less than 25 so I have only one candidate d to check and width 10 so length 60 meets the criteria and hence the answer
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top