MHB Find Width of Rectangle with 600yd2 and 140yd Fencing

  • Thread starter Thread starter alllove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Rectangle
AI Thread Summary
To determine the width of a rectangular enclosure with an area of at least 600 yd² and 140 yd of fencing, the width must be less than or equal to the length. The constraints lead to the inequality (70 - w)w ≥ 600, which simplifies to finding valid width values. The width must be less than the square root of 600, indicating it cannot exceed 25 yd. Given the conditions, the only feasible width is 10 yd, resulting in a length of 60 yd, which meets all criteria. Thus, the width must be 10 yd or greater, but not exceeding 25 yd.
alllove
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A rectangular enclosure must have an area of at least 600 yd2. If 140 yd of fencing is to be used, and the width cannot exceed the length, within what limits must the width of the enclosure lie?
Select one:
A. 35 ≤ w ≤ 60
B. 10 ≤ w ≤ 35
C. 10 ≤ w ≤ 60
D. 0 ≤ w ≤ 10
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
length, $L$ and width $(70-L)$

constraints ...

$70-L \le L$

$L(70-L) \ge 600$

see what you can do from here
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since the problem specifically asks about "w", the width, I would, instead, say that $(70- w)w\ge 600$.

Of course that's exactly the same as the inequality skeeter gave for L. There will be two solutions. It is the condition that "the width cannot exceed the length" that allows you to distinguish between them.
 
Width being less than square root of 600 I see that it is less than 25 so I have only one candidate d to check and width 10 so length 60 meets the criteria and hence the answer
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top