MHB Finding a basis for a Vector Space

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
View attachment 4284

4b). How can I find a basis? I was thinking of the standard basis $\{1,x,x^2\}$, but that doesn't work under the scalar multiplication definition in the vector space.

EDIT: I think it is $\{0,x,x^2\}$ and we take $1$ to be the $0$ vector!
$a(0)+b(x)+c(x^2)=1$ implies $a=b=c=0$.
It is strange, because I've done nearly all the questions in the book and I never encountered a question like this one.
 

Attachments

  • 2014 #4.PNG
    2014 #4.PNG
    13.8 KB · Views: 113
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rido12 said:
EDIT: I think it is $\{0,x,x^2\}$ and we take $1$ to be the $0$ vector!
$a(0)+b(x)+c(x^2)=1$ implies $a=b=c=0$.
It is strange, because I've done nearly all the questions in the book and I never encountered a question like this one.

Hey Rido!
You've got it. (Nod)
How is it different?
 
Hey ILS :D

Thanks for the reply!

It is different because in my book, vector spaces and linear independence are in different sections. So most of the time, I have only tried $a(1)+b(x)+c(x^2)=0$ where I set it to $0$, not $1$, and I would solve it under regular addition and multiplication.

This time:
$a(0)+b(x)+c(x^2)=1$
$a(0)-a+1+bx-b+1+cx^2-c+1=1$
$-a+bx-b+cx^2-c=0$

$\implies a=0$ (when $x=1$)
$\implies b=0$ (when $x=-1$)
And finally, $c=0$.
 
Rido12 said:
It is different because in my book, vector spaces and linear independence are in different sections. So most of the time, I have only tried $a(1)+b(x)+c(x^2)=0$ where I set it to $0$, not $1$, and I would solve it under regular addition and multiplication.

So it's a good exercise! (Mmm)

It alerts us to the fact that the addition and scalar multiplication defined for the vector space have to be used whenever checking anything.
Btw, to avoid confusion, a better notation for linear independence would be:
$$a \odot (0) \quad\oplus\quad b \odot (x) \quad\oplus\quad c \odot (x^2) \quad=\quad 0_{\mathbb P_2} \quad=\quad 1$$
(Nerd)
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Back
Top