MHB Finding a basis for a Vector Space

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
View attachment 4284

4b). How can I find a basis? I was thinking of the standard basis $\{1,x,x^2\}$, but that doesn't work under the scalar multiplication definition in the vector space.

EDIT: I think it is $\{0,x,x^2\}$ and we take $1$ to be the $0$ vector!
$a(0)+b(x)+c(x^2)=1$ implies $a=b=c=0$.
It is strange, because I've done nearly all the questions in the book and I never encountered a question like this one.
 

Attachments

  • 2014 #4.PNG
    2014 #4.PNG
    13.8 KB · Views: 119
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rido12 said:
EDIT: I think it is $\{0,x,x^2\}$ and we take $1$ to be the $0$ vector!
$a(0)+b(x)+c(x^2)=1$ implies $a=b=c=0$.
It is strange, because I've done nearly all the questions in the book and I never encountered a question like this one.

Hey Rido!
You've got it. (Nod)
How is it different?
 
Hey ILS :D

Thanks for the reply!

It is different because in my book, vector spaces and linear independence are in different sections. So most of the time, I have only tried $a(1)+b(x)+c(x^2)=0$ where I set it to $0$, not $1$, and I would solve it under regular addition and multiplication.

This time:
$a(0)+b(x)+c(x^2)=1$
$a(0)-a+1+bx-b+1+cx^2-c+1=1$
$-a+bx-b+cx^2-c=0$

$\implies a=0$ (when $x=1$)
$\implies b=0$ (when $x=-1$)
And finally, $c=0$.
 
Rido12 said:
It is different because in my book, vector spaces and linear independence are in different sections. So most of the time, I have only tried $a(1)+b(x)+c(x^2)=0$ where I set it to $0$, not $1$, and I would solve it under regular addition and multiplication.

So it's a good exercise! (Mmm)

It alerts us to the fact that the addition and scalar multiplication defined for the vector space have to be used whenever checking anything.
Btw, to avoid confusion, a better notation for linear independence would be:
$$a \odot (0) \quad\oplus\quad b \odot (x) \quad\oplus\quad c \odot (x^2) \quad=\quad 0_{\mathbb P_2} \quad=\quad 1$$
(Nerd)
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K