Finding a diagonalizable matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielJackins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding formulas for the entries of the matrix M raised to the power of n, where M is defined as a 2x2 matrix. The subject area includes linear algebra concepts such as eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and diagonalization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to diagonalize the matrix M and expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their eigenvalues and eigenvectors. They question whether their approach to raising the diagonal matrix D to the power n and multiplying by P and P^-1 is correct.
  • Some participants suggest verifying the calculations by comparing M^2 with the result obtained from the diagonalization process.
  • Others raise concerns about the correctness of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, indicating that the values provided may not be valid for the matrix M.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. There is an emphasis on verifying calculations and ensuring that the eigenvectors are ordered correctly in relation to the eigenvalues. Some guidance has been offered regarding the diagonalization process, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the initial assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share. There is a focus on ensuring that the eigenvalues and eigenvectors are accurately determined, as discrepancies in these values could affect the entire diagonalization process.

DanielJackins
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let M = [{-1, -6}{3, 8}] ( meaning {row1} {row2}

Find formulas for the entries of M^n, where n is a positive integer.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I found the eigenvalues and eigenvectors; e.value1 = 2, e.value2 = 5, e.vector1 = [{-2}{1}], e.vector2 = [{-1}{1}]. I'm 99% sure these are all correct.

So I proceed to write it as A = PDP^-1, with P as [{-2, -1}{1, 1}], D as [{2, 0}{0, 5}], and P^-1 as 1/10[{8,6}{-3,-1}].

So next I believe you're supposed to multiply them all together, with the 2 and 5 in D raised to the power of n. I did this and came up with a huge ugly jumble of numbers, which I entered and were incorrect. Am I doing this right? Or did I make a mistake somewhere?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to incorporate M in your equation, instead of A. So your equation would be
M = PDP-1
Then
Mn =(PDP-1)n
= (PDP-1)(PDP-1)...(PDP-1)
= (PDP-1PDP-1...PDP-1)
= PDnP-1

All the interior PP-1 products simplify to I, and you're left with what's shown above.

The idea is that, instead of raising M to the power n, you can raise D to the power n (easy to do, since it is a diagonal matrix), and then multiply that on the left by P and on the right by P-1.

I haven't checked your work, so once you get a result, verify it by comparing Mn for a small value of n (like 2), to see if it agrees with what you have on the right.
 
I did raise D to the power n, and then multiplied on the left by P and on the right by P^-1, and it gave me a big mess
 
DanielJackins said:
I did raise D to the power n, and then multiplied on the left by P and on the right by P^-1, and it gave me a big mess
Did you try it to the power 2? Compare M2 and PD2P-1. If they're not equal, here are some things to check.
  1. Your eigenvectors need to be in the matrix P in the same order that the eigenvalues are in the matrix D. IOW, in the same columns.
  2. Are your eigenvalues and eigenvectors correct? It should be that (A - (eigenvalue_1)I)(eigenvector_1) = 0, and the same for the other eigenvalue/eigenvector pair.
  3. You might have a mistake in your calculation for P-1.
 
Your first problem is that 2 and 5 are NOT eigenvalues of that matrix.
If 2 were an eigenvalue then we must have
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}-1 & -6 \\ 3 & -8\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}=2\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
Which gives the two equations -x- 6y= 2x and 3x- 8y= 2y. Those are the same as -3x- 6y= 0 and 3x- 10y= 0. Adding the two equations, -16y= 0 which is satisfied only if y= 0 and then we get x= 0. There is no non-trivial vector for which that is true. The same happens if you try 5 rather than 2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K