Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around finding theoretical physics laboratories and academic expertise in specific areas, particularly focusing on resources for identifying institutions and researchers in theoretical high energy physics, theoretical cosmology, and mathematical physics. Participants explore the availability of online databases or rankings that categorize institutions by specific fields rather than geographical location.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about online databases or rankings for theoretical physics labs with high-level expertise in specific areas.
- Another participant emphasizes the need to clarify what specific area of theoretical physics (TP) is of interest, noting that various subfields like theoretical condensed matter and theoretical nuclear physics are distinct.
- There is a discussion about the acronym "HCR," with some participants suggesting it stands for "Highly Cited Researchers," while others express uncertainty about its meaning.
- One participant mentions they are looking for a database where they can research fields and sub-fields themselves, specifically in theoretical high energy physics, theoretical cosmology, and mathematical physics.
- Advice is given to look at journals and the authors of papers in the participant's areas of interest to identify leading universities.
- Another participant suggests minimizing the use of acronyms that may not be widely recognized to facilitate better communication.
- A participant expresses interest in prestigious universities such as MIT, Princeton, Harvard, and Stanford, while also considering European institutions, particularly in Germany and the UK, for their theoretical physics programs.
- There is a mention of a desire for information or opportunities for research collaborations or positions in the mentioned prestigious institutions.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of a comprehensive database for theoretical physics labs. There is a mix of agreement on the importance of specifying areas of interest and disagreement on the use of acronyms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best resources for finding academic expertise.
Contextual Notes
Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the terminology and acronyms used, indicating a potential barrier to effective communication. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in defining specific areas of theoretical physics.