Finding acceleration from graphs (s vs t^2)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing a graph of displacement (s) versus time squared (t²) to determine acceleration. Participants are exploring the roles of independent and dependent variables in this context, as well as the implications of the slope of the graph based on kinematic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss which variable should be considered independent and which should be dependent, with suggestions leaning towards time squared as independent. Questions arise about the implications of the slope and how it relates to acceleration.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of how to properly plot the data and interpret the results. Some participants suggest starting the graph at the origin, while others question this approach based on the data values. Guidance on plotting error bars in Excel has been provided, and there is a recognition of the need to clarify the relationship between the slope and acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the object starts from rest, which influences the interpretation of the kinematic equation. There is also mention of potential negative slopes based on the initial conditions of the experiment.

BayernBlues
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If I’m to graph a plot of s (displacement) vs t^2 (time squared) then what would be the independent and dependent variable, t or s? I’m supposed to supposed to use this graph to find a slope with error bars and use the appropriate kinematics equation [which I think is s(t) = 1/2 at^2 (the vi*t is 0)]. The slope I will attain from the t^2 versus s graph, what will it represent? And how could I possibly plug it back into the equation to find acceleration? Thanks.

Also when I graph my results, should it be a positive or negative slope if the distance and time are decreasing every time? Because if it's a negative slope than that would mean that the x values for time squared would decrease going from 9.826 to 7.132

Homework Equations



s(t) = vi^t + 1/2a*t^2

The Attempt at a Solution



This is the table I'll use
Average Displacement (cm)-------->Average Time squared (t²) s
Distance 1 152.90 ± 0.05 cm--------->9.686
Distance 2 143.66 ± 0.05 cm--------->9.321
Distance 3 133.30 ± 0.04 cm--------->8.588
Distance 4 123.56 ± 0.02 cm--------->7.896
Distance 5 113.76 ± 0.02 cm--------->7.132
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are trying to draw a linear graph, right? And, as your graph will pass through the origin, this will have the form y=mx, correct? I'm going to assume that time is your independent variable, as it is the one with with you don't have a recorded error. Now, rearrange the formula to find m. Does the result seem familiar?

When drawing your graph, always start at the origin (0,0), and go towards infinity, for both x and y. Start with your lowest value of time, plot it, and continue up until you run out of points. In this way, you will not have a negative slope.
 
Actually, the error on time is +/- 0.0005 s. Anyways, I don't know about starting from 0, I mean, wouldn't that throw off the graph because the four intervals for time are 9.686 s, 9.321, 8.588 etc.

My other question now is should I have the time going from 9.686, 9.321, 8.588 or should I have the time increasins going from 7.132 s to 9.686?

Reason is because I'm supposed to find gravity from the acceleration. I'm guessing that the slope will be the value of 1/2*a from the kinematics equation.

Also, would anyone know how to show error bars on excel?
 
Right click on one of your points.

"Format data series"

"X Error Bars"
"Y Error Bars"


Plot it as increasing
 
Best to consider s as the dependent and t^2 as the independent variables.
Assuming you are using Excel?

If the object started out of rest the term ut can be dropped from the formula so

s = s_o + \frac{1}{2} at^2

which menas that the gradient of the graph should be half of the acceleration and the y-intercept the displacement of the object from the origin when it started to accelerate.

This approach gives you a negative gradient. This fits the situation where the origin was below the point where the object was released and it fell towards the origin, giving you a negative acceleration.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K