Finding all vectors normal to a given set of vectors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mds9668
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Set Vectors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding all vectors that are perpendicular to a given set of three vectors in R^4. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, including the use of dot products and the wedge product, while addressing the limitations of the cross product in higher dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to set up a system of equations in matrix form to find vectors perpendicular to three vectors in R^4, noting the requirement that the dot product of the normal vector and each given vector equals zero.
  • Another participant suggests writing out the equations for each dot product, providing an example of how to express the perpendicular vector in terms of its components.
  • A participant questions the applicability of the cross product in this context, implying it may not be suitable for R^4.
  • Another participant confirms that the cross product is defined only in R^3 and R^7, referencing a Wikipedia article for further clarification.
  • A later reply elaborates on the extension of the cross product to higher dimensions, mentioning a specific mathematical formulation involving determinants and the wedge product.
  • One participant introduces the wedge product as a method to find vectors perpendicular to the three given vectors, explaining how it leads to a linear combination of the vectors involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the cross product in R^4, with some asserting its limitations while others discuss alternative methods such as the wedge product. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to finding the perpendicular vectors.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of the cross product in higher dimensions and explore the wedge product as a potential solution, but the discussion does not reach a consensus on the most effective method for the problem at hand.

mds9668
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do you find all vectors perpendicular to a set of three vectors in R^4? I know that the dot product of a normal vector and each given vector will be equal to 0. How could I set up the system of equations in matrix form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, you just have to write out the equations for each dot product. For example, suppose the three vectors are v_1, v_2, v_3. Then let the perpendicular vector be u. So we know that u \cdot v_i = 0. Let u = (a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4)^T for concreteness.

So if v_1 = (x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)^T, then we have, after applying the dot product of u and v1:
a_1 x_1 + a_2 x_2 +a_3 x_3 + a_4 x_4 = 0. Do the same for the other two vectors and you have a system of equations which you can then express in matrix form.
 
could you not cross product??
 
||spoon|| said:
could you not cross product??

I believe the cross product is defined only in R^3, well as far as i know :P
 
danago said:
I believe the cross product is defined only in R^3, well as far as i know :P

Defennder said:
It's defined in R3 and R7 only, if I remember correctly. I don't know why, though. See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_product#Higher_dimensions

As the Wiki article says, there's more than one way to extend the cross product to higher dimensions. One very straightforward way extends it to all dimensions of Rn, but it's a little peculiar: In dimension n it becomes a function of n-1 vectors rather than a simple product of two vectors. This is mentioned in Spivak's classic monograph, Calculus on Manifolds, chapter 4, p83 in the old Benjamin edition. I'll quote the relevant snippet here:

If v_1, ..., v_{n-1} \in R^n and \phi is defined by

<br /> \phi(w) = det \left( \begin{matrix}<br /> v_1 \\<br /> ... \\<br /> v_{n-1} \\<br /> w<br /> \end{matrix} \right)<br />

then \phi \in \Lambda^1 (R^n); therefore there is a unique z \in R^n such that

<br /> \langle w,z \rangle = \phi(w) = det \left( \begin{matrix}<br /> v_1 \\<br /> ... \\<br /> v_{n-1} \\<br /> w<br /> \end{matrix} \right) <br />

This z is denoted

<br /> v_1 \times ... \times v_{n-1}<br />

and is called the cross product of v_1, ... v_{n-1}.

.
 
Welcome to PF!

mds9668 said:
How do you find all vectors perpendicular to a set of three vectors in R^4? I know that the dot product of a normal vector and each given vector will be equal to 0. How could I set up the system of equations in matrix form?

Hi mds9668! Welcome to PF! :smile:

You use the wedge product, ⋀, of all three vectors (with x⋀x = 0).

That will give you a 3-form, which is a linear combination a.x⋀y⋀z + b.y⋀z⋀t + c.z⋀x⋀t + d.x⋀y⋀t.

The vectors perpendicular to all three will be the multiples of a.t + b.x + c.y + d.z

(because (a.t + b.x + c.y + d.z)(a.x⋀y⋀z + b.y⋀z⋀t + c.z⋀x⋀t + d.x⋀y⋀t) = a² + b² + c² + d²) :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K