Finding an Orthogonal Basis of Polynomials Using Gram-Schmidt Process

  • Thread starter Thread starter cookiesyum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Orthogonal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding an orthogonal basis of polynomials in the space P2 using the Gram-Schmidt process. The polynomials f1 = x^2 + 3, f2 = 1 - x, f3 = 2x^2 + x + 1, and f4 = x + 1 are provided as a basis for the span. The participants confirm that starting with g(x) = 1 is acceptable, and the procedure outlined for calculating the orthogonal basis is correct. The key equations involve the inner product defined as = a0b0 + a1b1 + a2b2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial spaces, specifically P2 in k[x]
  • Familiarity with the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process
  • Knowledge of inner product definitions for polynomials
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Gram-Schmidt process in detail, focusing on its application to polynomial spaces
  • Explore the concept of orthogonal bases in vector spaces
  • Learn about inner product spaces and their properties
  • Practice finding orthogonal bases for different sets of polynomials
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra and polynomial functions, as well as anyone interested in the application of the Gram-Schmidt process in polynomial spaces.

cookiesyum
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let P2 denote the space of polynomials in k[x] and degree < or = 2. Let f, g exist in P2 such that

f(x) = a2x^2 + a1x + a0
g(x) = b2x^2 + b1x + b0

Define

<f, g> = a0b0 + a1b1 + a2b2

Let f1, f2, f3, f4 be given as below

f1 = x^2 + 3
f2 = 1 - x
f3 = 2x^2 + x + 1
f4 = x + 1

Find an orthogonal basis of Span(f1, f2, f3, f4).

Homework Equations



Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process.

The Attempt at a Solution



Span(f1, f2, f3, f4) = Span(w1, w2, w3, w4)

Take S = {f, 1}

w1 = f1
w2 = 1 - (<1, f1>/<f1, f1>)*f1
w3 = 1 - (<1, f2>/<f2, f2>)*f2 - (<1, f1>/<f1, f1>)*f1
w4 = 1 - (<1, f3>/<f3, f3>)*f3 - (<1, f2>/<f2, f2>)*f2 - (<1, f1>/<f1, f1>)*f1

Is this the correct procedure? Can I take g = 1 like that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me. There's nothing wrong with starting with g(x) = 1.
 
Mark44 said:
Looks good to me. There's nothing wrong with starting with g(x) = 1.

Thanks a bunch!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K