Finding an upper bound for the cosmological constant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving an upper bound for the cosmological constant (Λ) using weak-field approximations in the context of Einstein's Field Equations (EFE). The participant successfully derives an expression for the Newtonian potential (φ) and concludes that the upper bound for Λ is 8.6 x 10-35 m-2. However, they note discrepancies between their result and those found in external references, specifically regarding a factor of 2 in the solution to the differential equation. This indicates a potential oversight in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Field Equations (EFE)
  • Familiarity with weak-field approximations in general relativity
  • Knowledge of Newtonian potential and Laplacian operator
  • Ability to manipulate differential equations in a physics context
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Einstein's Field Equations in the context of cosmology
  • Study the implications of weak-field approximations in general relativity
  • Examine the differences in solutions to differential equations in gravitational contexts
  • Explore the significance of the cosmological constant in modern astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Students of general relativity, physicists working on cosmological models, and researchers interested in the implications of the cosmological constant in theoretical physics.

davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


(Working with geometrised units)

Consider the EFE

##G^{\alpha \beta }+\Lambda g^{\alpha \beta} = 8 \pi T^{\alpha \beta} ##

work out (using weak-field considerations) an upper bound for the cosmological constant knowing that the radius of Pluto's orbit is 5.9 x 10^12 m.

Homework Equations


##G^{\alpha \beta} = -\frac{1}{2}\Box \bar{h}^{\alpha \beta}##

The Attempt at a Solution



The only important component will be ##\bar{h}^{00}##. Also, we will have to approximate the metric tensor as just ##g^{\alpha \beta} = \eta^{\alpha \beta}##. Also, we neglect the temporal derivatives of ##\bar{h}## since we are assuming non relativistic speeds.

With this in mind our EFE is written as

##\nabla^2\bar{h}^{00}=-16\pi \rho - 2\Lambda ##

Writing ##\bar{h}^{00}=-4\phi ## where ##\phi## is our Newtonian potential we get

##\nabla^2 \phi = 4 \pi \rho + \Lambda / 2 ##

The trivial part of ##\phi## is ##-M/r## with ##M## the mass of the sun. We propose the other solution as ##Cr^2##

Writing out the Laplacian we should arrive at

##6C=\Lambda/2##

Where we get that ##C=\Lambda / 12 ## and we conclude that

##\phi=\frac{-M}{r} + \frac{\Lambda}{12}r^2##

Our upper-bound (so that effects of the cosmological constant will become negligible) will be written as

##\frac{\Lambda}{12}r^2 < M/r##

where we arrive at ##\Lambda = 8.6 \times 10^{-35}m^-2 ## as an upper bound.

Now my question is: Chapter 8 18(a) http://www.aei.mpg.de/~schutz/download/FirstCourseGR2.Solutions.1_0.pdf

cites exactly half of what I've got.

http://www.physik.uzh.ch/lectures/agr/GR_Exercises/ex11.pdf

says the solution to the EFE equation is ##\phi=-M/r+\frac{\Lambda}{6} r^2 ##

which is slightly different from what I've got, and gives the "correct" upper limit cited in the first link.

I've been checking for hours now my solution and can't find where that factor on my solution to the diff eq went to. Any help will be much appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
My guess is this problem might seem tedious to follow, but its really not, provided you know the relevant equations. Although it has the style of a typical homework question, maybe it would fit better into the relativity section ? I don't know. Thanks anyways.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K