Finding Angular Frequency for Simple Harmonic Motion - Mass and Rod System

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the angular frequency of a mass and rod system undergoing simple harmonic motion. The setup involves a massless rod with two different masses attached at either end, and the problem requires the application of rotational dynamics and small angle approximations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the angular frequency using torque and moment of inertia, expressing their reasoning through equations. They question the validity of their result and seek confirmation. Other participants suggest checking the result against the standard physical pendulum equation and provide links for further verification.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance and suggesting alternative methods for verification. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's approach, and while some participants express satisfaction with the results, they remain open to further comments and insights.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's method differs from their usual approach, which typically involves energy considerations. There is also mention of the need to compute the distance from the support to the center of mass for verification.

sjmacewan
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
OK, the answer for this problem seems a bit high to me, so I'm going to ask if it all seems alright.

You have a 1m rod of no mass, fixed so that it may rotate about it's center. At the top of the rod is a mass m1 (0.5kg), and the bottom is a mass m2 (1.0kg). Find the angular frequency assuming a small amplitude of oscillations.

I just stared at it for about an hour, trying to find a way to get it into the form

[tex]\ddot{\psi} + \omega_0 ^2 \psi = 0[/tex]

Eventually i went at it with torques, using the [tex]\tau = r x F[/tex] formula.

So...

[tex]\tau = rm_1g \sin (180- \theta) - rm_2g \sin (\theta)[/tex]

and using small angle approximation, both sins go to theta.

[tex]\tau = rg (m_2 - m_1) \theta[/tex]
[tex]\tau = I \ddot{\theta} = -rg (m_2 - m_1) \theta[/tex]
[tex]I = \sum m r^2 = (m_1 + m_2) r^2[/tex]

[tex]\ddot{\theta} = \frac{-rg (m_2 - m_1)}{r^2 (m_1+m_2)}[/tex]
[tex]\ddot{\theta} + \frac{rg (m_2 - m_1)}{r^2 (m_1+m_2)} = 0[/tex]

Which is in the right form. Meaning that the frequency is:
[tex]\omega_0 = \sqrt{\frac{g(m_2-m_1)}{r(m_1+m_2)}}[/tex]

Now, that may be ALL wrong, but it's what first came to mind. I end up with 2.6Hz for an answer which seems a bit off...

Thanks for any redirections/confirmations/help you can give!

(if the tex is messy I'm working on it still!)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could check your answer using the standard physical pendulum equation

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pendp.html

You already have an expression for I, and the mass and g are easy. You just need to compute the distance from support to CM. I think you will like it. I did not check your computation, but the answer looks good.
 
excellant! what a helpful script! The answer does end up being the same, so I'm going to assume my theory-work was good. It's not EXACTLY how we;ve been doing those questions (been using energies and such) but I found this one much easier to follow.

Thanks a lot! (still open for comments though)
 
sjmacewan said:
Thanks a lot! (still open for comments though)
Well, if you look at the first part of the link, you wil find your

[tex]\ddot{\psi} + \omega_0 ^2 \psi = 0[/tex]

Just replace their variable with yours
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K