Finding angular velocity after a collision

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular velocity and center-of-mass velocity of a spherical satellite after a collision with space junk. The initial conditions include the satellite's velocity and angular speed, and the space junk's approach velocity. The user successfully calculated the center-of-mass velocities but struggled with the change in angular velocity, initially arriving at an incorrect value. It was suggested that the user derive the correct equations for momentum and angular momentum conservation to resolve the discrepancies. The final energy change was correctly calculated once the correct angular velocity was obtained.
jhyrman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A spherical satellite of approximately uniform density with radius 5.1 m and mass 280 kg is originally moving with velocity
leftangle0.gif
2600, 0, 0
rightangle0.gif
m/s, and is originally rotating with an angular speed 2 rad/s, in the direction shown in the diagram. A small piece of space junk of mass 7.6 kg is initially moving toward the satellite with velocity
leftangle0.gif
−2200, 0, 0
rightangle0.gif
m/s. The space junk hits the edge of the satellite as shown in the figure below, and moves off with a new velocity
leftangle0.gif
−1300, 480, 0
rightangle0.gif
m/s. Both before and after the collision, the rotation of the space junk is negligible.
11-7-049.png

(a) Just after the collision, what are the components of the center-of-mass velocity of the satellite (vx and vy) and its rotational speed ω? (For vx, enter your answer to at least four significant figures.)
(b) Calculate the rise in the internal energy of the satellite and space junk combined.

Homework Equations


From Wiley Matter and Interactions, 4e, vol 1, p. 434-35:
## P_{xf} = P_{xi} ##
## v_{s,xf} = v_{s,xi} + \frac{m}{M}(v_{j,xi} - v_{j,xf}) cos \theta ##

## P_{yf} = P_{yi} ##
## v_{s,yf} = v_{s,yi} + \frac{m}{M}(v_{j,yi} - v_{j,yf}) sin \theta ##

No net torques:
## L_f = L_i ##
## I \omega_i + hmv_1 sin(90 - \theta) = I \omega_f + hmv_2 sin(90 - \theta) ##
Solid sphere: ## I = \frac{2}{5}MR^2 ##
## \omega_f = \omega_i + \frac{hm}{\frac{2}{5}MR^2}(v_1 - v_2) cos \theta ##

The Attempt at a Solution


I have already viewed the key and have the answers, but I still have questions on how to find the answer.
I was able to get Vx and Vy for the satelite using the above equations. I used theta=0, and used cos theta for the y component. I'm not sure why this worked though.
## v_{s,xf} = 2600 + \frac{7.6}{280}(-2200 + 1300) cos 0 = 2575.57 m/s ##
## v_{s,yf} = 0 + \frac{7.6}{280}(0 - 480) cos 0 = -13.03 m/s ##
These are both correct according to the key.

I did not get the correct answer for the change in angular velocity. I used
## \omega_f = 2 + \frac{(5.1)(7.6)}{2913.12}(2200 - 1385.78) cos 0 = 12.83 rad/s, +\hat{z} ##
The correct answer according to the key is 9.97 rad/s, no direction given.

I could find the difference in energy after I had the correct angular velocity of the satellite. There are no external forces so no work is being done, so the only difference in energy is the difference in kinetic energy. I calculated this using the given correct angular velocity of the satellite and got the right answer, 2.86e+7.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jhyrman said:

Homework Equations


From Wiley Matter and Interactions, 4e, vol 1, p. 434-35:
## P_{xf} = P_{xi} ##
## v_{s,xf} = v_{s,xi} + \frac{m}{M}(v_{j,xi} - v_{j,xf}) cos \theta ##

## P_{yf} = P_{yi} ##
## v_{s,yf} = v_{s,yi} + \frac{m}{M}(v_{j,yi} - v_{j,yf}) sin \theta ##
The above equations are not correct. Start from ## P_{xf} = P_{xi} ## and derive the correct equation that should take the place of ## v_{s,xf} = v_{s,xi} + \frac{m}{M}(v_{j,xi} - v_{j,xf}) cos \theta ##.

Likewise for ## P_{yf} = P_{yi} ##.

## L_f = L_i ##
## I \omega_i + hmv_1 sin(90 - \theta) = I \omega_f + hmv_2 sin(90 - \theta) ##

Again, this isn't correct if the ##\theta## on the left side is the same angle as the ##\theta## on the right side. Try setting up your own equation for ## L_f = L_i ##.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
3K