Finding Approximate Location of Particle at Time t=1.05

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the approximate location of a particle at time t = 1.05, given its initial position at (1, 3) and a velocity field defined by F(x, y) = (xy - 2, y^2 - 10). The approach involves using the equations dx/dt = xy - 2 and dy/dt = y^2 - 10 to calculate the changes in position over a small time increment, Δt. By evaluating these equations at t = 1 and applying the small time step, the particle's new position can be approximated effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and their components
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
  • Familiarity with integration techniques
  • Concept of small increments in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Euler's method for numerical integration
  • Learn about vector field analysis in physics
  • Explore the concept of Taylor series for approximating functions
  • Investigate the implications of small time increments in dynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with particle motion and vector fields, particularly those looking to enhance their understanding of differential equations and numerical methods for approximating solutions.

Kokordilos
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This isn't really even a homework question..i've just been reviewing some general math concepts and this one has been driving me nuts..i haven't done math in a while.

At time t = 1, a particle is located at position (1,3). If it moves in a velocity field F(x,y) = <xy-2,y^2 - 10>, find its approximate location at time t = 1.05

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought, maybe:
dx/dt = xy - 2 and dy/dt = y^2 - 10
So I can integrate, so x(t) = (1/2)x^2 * y - 2x + C and y(t) = (1/3)y^3 - 10Y + C and solving for the constants is trivial based on the initial conditions, but then I get totally confused. How do I put this in terms of T? And did I even do this right? It doesn't make sense to me that the position should be the function of a position. I must have done my integral wrong.

Can you guys help me out...really stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
Here's how I would approach it, and if anyone disagrees, I hope they will jump in and correct my reasoning.

You have the velocity field F(x, y) = (xy - 2, y^2 - 10). I agree that the components are dx/dt and dy/dt.

For small values of [itex]\Delta t[/itex], F(x, y) [itex]\Delta t[/itex] should give the approximate changes in x and y.

IOW, (dx/dt, dy/dt) [itex]\Delta t \approx (\Delta x, \Delta y)[/itex]
or (x, y) + (dx/dt, dy/dt)*dt [itex]\approx (x, y) + (\Delta x, \Delta y)[/itex], where x, y, dx/dt, and dy/dt are evaluated at t = 1.

Because the time increment is relatively small, the changes in x and y probably will be relatively small as well, so you should end up at a point not far from (1, 3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K