Finding Area Under a Helix: A Stumper Problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Moo Of Doom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Helix
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenge of finding the area under a helix, specifically the area between the helix and the line it encircles. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, including integral setups and parameterizations, while also touching on related concepts such as arc length and surface area of helical structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in setting up an integral for the area under a helix, noting challenges with approximating infinitesimal cuts.
  • Another participant suggests that any arbitrary section of a helix may have an area equivalent to that of an arc with matching edge lengths, though they caution that this is based on intuition.
  • A different participant proposes a parametrization of the helical surface using coordinates (u,v) and derives an area element dA = √(v² + 1), suggesting an integral to find the area over specified bounds.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the integral, with a participant seeking clarification on how to compute arc length, presenting their own expression for dL.
  • Another participant points out that the integrand's independence from u simplifies the integral into a product of single-variable integrals.
  • A participant describes their method for deriving the arc length expression, involving a geometric approach to relate dy and dx, leading to a more complex expression than necessary.
  • One participant offers a simpler parameterization for the helix, leading to an easier integration for arc length.
  • A participant expresses a feeling of inadequacy after realizing the simplicity of the arc length calculation, which simplifies to L = b√2.
  • A new participant introduces a related problem regarding the calculation of contact surface area on a threaded bolt, indicating additional complexity due to the helix's surface area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on a single method for calculating the area under a helix or the arc length. Multiple competing ideas and methods are presented, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' approaches depend on specific parameterizations and assumptions about the geometry of the helix, which may not be universally applicable. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the problem.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in calculus, particularly in applications involving curves and surfaces, as well as those dealing with helical structures in engineering or physics contexts.

Moo Of Doom
Messages
365
Reaction score
1
I have been long thinking on how one would set up an integral to find the area under a helix (the area between the helix and the line it is encircling). I couldn't get a good expression for dA, because the infinitessimal cuts were all bent, and I wasn't sure how I could accurately approximate them with flat sections.

I was planning on finding a general form for the area under a graph as it was being rotated around an axis (in a helix-kind-of-way), but I was stumped at the most basic case >.<

Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me, that any arbitrary section of a helix (say a section that rotates through 90 degrees) will be equivalent in area to that of an arc with the same outer and inner edge lengths.

See attached pic.

Don't take my word on it though. I'm not schooled in this area, and this is just intuition.
 
Last edited:
Hmm, let's figure out the area element for your helical surface. I covered it with coordinates (u,v) such that v is the distance from the spiral axis and u was the distance from the "bottom" of the helix measured on the surface of the helical surface along a helix of radius v. Flattening this out to the familiar R^2, we get the set R x (0,1) for a helical surface with min radius of 0 and max radius of 1. Using this set, a parametrization of your helical surface would then be x = v*cos(u), y=v*sin(u), z=u.
Then we have the area element dA = \sqrt{v^2 + 1}. To get the area of the portion of this surface between u=0, u=2\pi, v=0, and v=1, we would evaluate the integral \int_0^1 \int_0^{2\pi} \sqrt{v^2 + 1} du dv.
 
Last edited:
Ouch, an integral of an integral, I feared it was going to be something like this... Thanks. On a related note, how would you do arclength? I got it down to

dL = \sqrt{dx^2+2a^2-2a\cos{\frac{2\pi dx}{b}}}

where dL is a portion of the arclength, dx is a portion of the helix (along the u-axis in hypermorphism's system), a is the radius of the helix, and b is the rate of curvature (measured in distance along u per revolution).

But I couldn't get the dx out of the cosine, so I was stuck there...

P.S. I was sure I was posting this in the Calculus board... strange how it ended up here... sorry about that.
 
Regarding the surface area, given that the integrand is independent of u, the iterated integral is just a product of two single variable integrals.
Regarding arc length, there's no need to resort to infinitesimal series. See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ArcLength.html . What path did you follow to get your expression ?
 
Last edited:
It was a bit overcomplicated how I got the arclength expression. I figured dL=\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dy)^2}. But I had to get dy in terms of dx, so I used an isosceles triangle and the rate of curvature in order to calculate dy. I found dy=\sqrt{2a^2-2a\cos{d\theta}}, where d\theta=\frac{2\pi dx}{b}. Then I plugged that into my original equation.
 
A good way to do calculus on a helix is with paremeterization:

x = cos(t)

y = sin(t)

z = t

Then the element of arclength is:

dL = \sqrt{(\frac{dx}{dt})^2 +(\frac{dy}{dt})^2 +(\frac{dz}{dt})^2} dt

Which is pretty easy to integrate.
 
... I feel stupid >.<

Of course that's how you'd do it.

Hmm... after working with it, it seems to simplify to dL=\sqrt{2}dt. When you integrate that, it just comes to L=b\sqrt{2} where b is the length of the portion of the helix. Very simple indeed. Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K