Finding CDF given boundary conditions (simple stats and calc)

In summary: OP's problem is to find values for a and b in terms of p and u, and to use the fact that f(t) is a cdf to find these values. In summary, OP's problem is to find values for a and b in terms of p and u, and to use the fact that f(t) is a cdf to find these values.
  • #1
bodycare
10
2
TL;DR Summary
Simple statistics and calc problem. Given two boundary conditions of a cdf how does one find the interval of the cdf.
I'm not quite sure if my problem is considered a calculus problem or a statistics problem, but I believe it to be a statistics related problem. Below is a screenshot of what I'm dealing with.

245091


For a) I expressed f(t) in terms of parameters p and u, and I got: $$f(t)=\frac{-u \cdot a + u \cdot b + a}{(\frac{1}{p \cdot(p-1)}+\frac{1}{p}+u \cdot a - u \cdot b - a)\cdot(\frac{1}{p \cdot (p-1)}+\frac{1}{p})} $$

I am unsure how to use this to find the values for a and b. I assume (hence my post in the stats forum) that I need to use the fact that f(t) is a cdf. I was thinking that since f(t) is a cdf that f(0)=0 and f(D)=M, since 0 work would be done at time t=0 and all the work would be done after D days, but this is just a thought. I need with finding the values a and b which I believe will set me up for solving b).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
can you explain the meaning of

D as the total number of days left to complete the task

what does that mean? By any interpretation I can think of, D is not a constant and is a function of time elapsed thus far, i.e. ##t##, but that contradicts that statement that

the constant C is given by
##C = \frac{\sqrt{D(D+4)} - D}{2}##

because ##C## varies with ##D## and hence is a function of time too and thus not a constant.

- - - - -
I can make guesses on how to properly interpret the above, but that is not very productive.
 
  • #3
StoneTemplePython said:
can you explain the meaning of
what does that mean? By any interpretation I can think of, D is not a constant and is a function of time elapsed thus far, i.e. ##t##, but that contradicts that statement that
because ##C## varies with ##D## and hence is a function of time too and thus not a constant.

- - - - -
I can make guesses on how to properly interpret the above, but that is not very productive.

I actually wondered the same thing. The picture I posted is all the information that is given. Although the problem set is based of a model which can be found in this edition of PT https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/PT.3.3064
 
  • #4
bodycare said:
I actually wondered the same thing. The picture I posted is all the information that is given. Although the problem set is based of a model which can be found in this edition of PT https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/PT.3.3064

hmmmm, what did you mean by "with slightly different meanings" which was in your post but seems to be edited out?

If the meanings are the same, then the picture in the link is actually quite helpful...
 
  • #5
StoneTemplePython said:
hmmmm, what did you mean by "with slightly different meanings" which was in your post but seems to be edited out?

If the meanings are the same, then the picture in the link is actually quite helpful...

Not sure If I understand. I mean in PT N(t) is number of submissions received by day t whereas N(t) in my problem set is the amount of work done after t days. To me those descriptions of N(t) are quite similar, but not exactly the same.
 
  • #6
bodycare said:
Not sure If I understand. I mean in PT N(t) is number of submissions received by day t whereas N(t) in my problem set is the amount of work done after t days. To me those descriptions of N(t) are quite similar, but not exactly the same.
I suppose I wouldn't dwell on it. The author seems to be using ##N(t)## as an absolutely continuous random variable, though of course this isn't true of any counting variable or counting process. The approximation used by the author may be easier to work with though.

So you have a pdf
##f(t) = \frac{t}{(D+C-t)(D+C)} = \frac{1}{D+C-t} -\frac{1}{D+C}##

and a CDF for ## x \in [0, D]##
##F(x) = \alpha \int_0^x \frac{t}{(D+C-t)(D+C)} dt= \alpha \int_0^x \big(\frac{1}{D+C-t} -\frac{1}{D+C}\big)dt ##
or
##F(x) = \alpha \big(\int_0^x \frac{1}{D+C-t}dt\big) - \alpha\frac{x}{D+C}##

you can directly verify that this is zero when ##x = 0##
you now need to solve for ##\alpha## such that this is 1 when x is set equal to D
edit:
I seems to have misread this. The original screenshot defines f(t) to in effect be the CDF. This is extremely misleading from a notational standpoint, but it checks out.

if f(t) is infact to be the cdf (cumulative percentage of work completed) then evaluating at t=D gives
##\frac{1}{D}-\frac{1}{D+C} = 1##
which holds, e.g. here

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/((sqrt(d(d+4))+-+d)/2)+-+1/(d+++(sqrt(d(d+4))+-+d)/2+)

So it is a valid CDF. There are no 'boundary conditions' needed to normalize this CDF in this form. It seems that OP's issue is to do some substitutions and figure out the implied values of ##u## and ##p## from here.

cleanup edit:
in the edit section, I meant to type
##f(D) = \frac{1}{D +C - D} - \frac{1}{C+D} = \frac{1}{C } - \frac{1}{D+C}##
the wolfram link lines up with this
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bodycare
  • #7
StoneTemplePython said:
I suppose I wouldn't dwell on it. The author seems to be using ##N(t)## as an absolutely continuous random variable, though of course this isn't true of any counting variable or counting process. The approximation used by the author may be easier to work with though.

So you have a pdf
##f(t) = \frac{t}{(D+C-t)(D+C)} = \frac{1}{D+C-t} -\frac{1}{D+C}##

and a CDF for ## x \in [0, D]##
##F(x) = \alpha \int_0^x \frac{t}{(D+C-t)(D+C)} dt= \alpha \int_0^x \big(\frac{1}{D+C-t} -\frac{1}{D+C}\big)dt ##
or
##F(x) = \alpha \big(\int_0^x \frac{1}{D+C-t}dt\big) - \alpha\frac{x}{D+C}##

you can directly verify that this is zero when ##x = 0##
you now need to solve for ##\alpha## such that this is 1 when x is set equal to D
edit:
I seems to have misread this. The original screenshot defines f(t) to in effect be the CDF. This is extremely misleading from a notational standpoint, but it checks out.

if f(t) is infact to be the cdf (cumulative percentage of work completed) then evaluating at t=D gives
##\frac{1}{D}-\frac{1}{D+C} = 1##
which holds, e.g. here

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/((sqrt(d(d+4))+-+d)/2)+-+1/(d+++(sqrt(d(d+4))+-+d)/2+)

So it is a valid CDF. There are no 'boundary conditions' needed to normalize this CDF in this form. It seems that OP's issue is to do some substitutions and figure out the implied values of ##u## and ##p## from here.
I believe you made a small mistake.
How did you get ##\frac{1}{D}-\frac{1}{D+C} = 1##
When I plug in t=D I get ##f(D)=\frac{1}{C}-\frac{D}{D+C}##
 
  • #8
bodycare said:
I believe you made a small mistake.
How did you get ##\frac{1}{D}-\frac{1}{D+C} = 1##
When I plug in t=D I get ##f(D)=\frac{1}{C}-\frac{D}{D+C}##
plug in: ## C = \big(\sqrt{(D(D+4))} - D\big)\cdot \frac{1}{2}## -- as defined in your original post
Then click the wolfram link in my post
 
  • #9
StoneTemplePython said:
plug in: ## C = \big(\sqrt{(D(D+4))} - D\big)\cdot \frac{1}{2}## -- as defined in your original post
Then click the wolfram link in my post
I agree with your wolfram link since that included the fraction ## \frac{1}{C} - \frac{1}{D+C}## but what you wrote in the post was ##\frac{1}{D} - \frac{1}{D+C}##
 
  • #10
bodycare said:
I agree with your wolfram link since that included the fraction ## \frac{1}{C} - \frac{1}{D+C}## but what you wrote in the post was ##\frac{1}{D} - \frac{1}{D+C}##
yes -- typo in my post, but not in the wolfram calculation. it happens.
 
  • #11
StoneTemplePython said:
yes -- typo in my post, but not in the wolfram calculation. it happens.
I apologize for nitpicking. I am unsure how to find the values for a and b. When I did my substitution with p and u I got##f(t)=\frac{-u \cdot a + u \cdot b + a}{(\frac{1}{p \cdot(p-1)}+\frac{1}{p}+u \cdot a - u \cdot b - a)\cdot(\frac{1}{p \cdot (p-1)}+\frac{1}{p})} ##

but I am unable to go on from here.
 

1. What is a Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF)?

A Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) is a mathematical function that represents the probability distribution of a continuous random variable. It shows the probability that the variable will take on a value less than or equal to a given value.

2. How do I find the CDF given boundary conditions?

To find the CDF given boundary conditions, you will need to use the boundary conditions to determine the limits of integration. Then, you can use the appropriate integration techniques to calculate the CDF. This can vary depending on the type of distribution and the specific boundary conditions given.

3. What is the relationship between the PDF and CDF?

The Probability Density Function (PDF) and the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) are closely related. The CDF is the integral of the PDF, and the PDF is the derivative of the CDF. This means that the CDF can be used to calculate probabilities for specific values, while the PDF shows the probability density at a given point.

4. Can the CDF be used to calculate probabilities for any continuous random variable?

Yes, the CDF can be used to calculate probabilities for any continuous random variable. However, the specific method for calculating the CDF may vary depending on the distribution and the given boundary conditions.

5. How can I use the CDF to find the median of a distribution?

The median of a distribution is the value that divides the distribution into two equal halves. To find the median using the CDF, you can set the CDF equal to 0.5 and solve for the corresponding value of the random variable. This value will be the median of the distribution.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
78
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
335
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
17
Views
800
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
681
Replies
10
Views
667
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
805
Back
Top