Finding cell emf in a concentration cell

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the electromotive force (emf) of a concentration cell constructed with silver-silver chloride electrodes, specifically using the half-reaction AgCl(s) + e- = Ag(s) + Cl-(aq). The participants clarify that in a concentration cell, the compartment with the lower concentration of Cl- (1.41×10−2 M) acts as the cathode, while the higher concentration (2.70 M) serves as the anode. The Nernst equation is applied incorrectly by some users, leading to confusion about the roles of the electrodes. The correct application of the Nernst equation is crucial for determining the emf accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrochemical cells and their components
  • Familiarity with the Nernst equation and its application
  • Knowledge of half-reactions in electrochemistry
  • Concept of concentration gradients in electrochemical reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Nernst equation in detail, focusing on its derivation and applications
  • Explore the principles of concentration cells and their behavior
  • Learn about the solubility product constant (Ksp) and its role in electrochemical reactions
  • Investigate the relationship between ion concentration and electrode potential in electrochemical systems
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, electrochemists, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electrochemical cells and their calculations.

4LeafClover
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Question:
A voltaic cell is constructed with two silver-silver chloride electrodes, each of which is based on the following half-reaction: AgCl(s) + e- = Ag(s) + Cl-(aq). The two cell compartments have [Cl-]= 1.41×10−2 M and [Cl-]= 2.70 M, respectively. What is the emf of the cell for the concentrations given?

My Work:
I found the standard emf of the cell to be 0 V and then I tried to use the Nernst equation to find emf, but it came out wrong. I also answered a previous multiple choice question which told me that the compartment with the 1.41×10−2 M Cl(aq) is the cathode (I don't understand why though because I thought the more concentrated one was the cathode...) So then here is what I did: Standard EMF = 0-((8.3145*298)/(1*96485)) * ln ((1.41×10−2 M)/2.7) but the answer I am getting is incorrect. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
4LeafClover said:
I also answered a previous multiple choice question which told me that the compartment with the 1.41×10−2 M Cl(aq) is the cathode (I don't understand why though because I thought the more concentrated one was the cathode...)

More concentrated what? Concentration cell tries to make both concentrations identical.

I don't see what can be wrong with your calculation of EMF though, equation seems correct. Unless I am too sleepy to think correctly.

--
 
Ya, I thought my calculations were correct too, but they're not for some reason. And what I meant by more concentrated, I wondering if, when you make a concentration cell and you start off with one solution that is more concentrated and then one that is more diluted (in order to make electrons transfer) then isn't the one that is more concentrated usually the cathode end and the one that is more diluted the anode end? I understand that in the end they will end up with the same concentration, but at the beginning is this how it works??
 
1. Solution is not cathode - electrode in solution is either anode or cathode.

2. You have not stated concentration of what.

--
methods
 
My chemistry book explicitly states that, in a concentration cell whose compartments both consist of a strip of nickel metal immersed in solutions of different concentrations of Ni^2+, that oxidation occurs in the half cell containing the more dilute solution and is therefore the anode and that reduction of Ni^2+ occurs in the half cell containing the more concentrated solution and is the cathode department. But when I applied this to the question above and chose the more concentrated solution to be the anode, (the one where [Cl-]=2.70M) I got the answer wrong. When I chose the more dilute solution to be the cathode, I got it correct. Why does my chem book say one thing but then my homework is the opposite? What is correct?
 
You are missing something very basic, and I have already pointed twice to the problem in your thinking. There is NO DIFFERENCE between your homework and your textbook.

--
methods
 
Actually my textbook is telling me that the more concentrated solution is the cathode but my homework is telling me the more dilute ([Cl-]= 1.41×10−2 M) is my cathode. Can you explain to me what you mean because just telling me I'm not understanding isn't helping me to understand.
 
Compare both examples. Higher concentration of WHAT?

What are electrode reactions?

--
methods
 
Ok, well, if the reaction is AgCl(s) + e- = Ag(s) + Cl-(aq) and the two cell compartments have [Cl-]= 1.41×10−2 M and [Cl-]= 2.70 M, that means that there is higher electron concentration in the first because lower Cl- concentration means that there are more free electrons. Is that what they are meaning?
 
  • #10
No, there is no such thing as free electrons, nor free electron concentration.

Write electrode reactions for both Ni case and Ag case.

--
 
  • #11
For Ni:
Anode: Ni(s) --> Ni^2+(aq) + 2e-
Cathode: Ni^2+(aq) + 2e- --> Ni(s)

For Ag:
Anode: Ag(s) + Cl-(aq) --> AgCl(aq) + 1e-
Cathode: AgCl(aq) + 1e- --> Cl-(aq) + Ag(s)
 
  • #12
4LeafClover said:
Cathode: Ni^2+(aq) + 2e- --> Ni(s)

Cathode: AgCl(aq) + 1e- --> Cl-(aq) + Ag(s)

Have you noticed difference between these two cases? Can you rewrite second equation in terms of Ag+ cation reduction? Do you know how to calculate Ag+ concentration in solution (given Cl- concentration)?

--
 
  • #13
Well I guess the difference between the two would be that in the second, Ag is reduced while the oxidation state of Cl- remains the same. The concentration for this equation is given in terms of Cl- instead of the species that is reduced whereas in the first instance the concentration is given in terms of the species that is reduced.

The second equation, just in terms of Ag, would be AgCl(aq) + 1e- --> Ag(s) because in the AgCl case Ag is +1 and in the solid Ag case, Ag is 0.

If I had an equilibrium constant I could calculate the exact concentration of Ag+ in terms of Cl- but it would be something like K=[Cl-]/[AgCl] and therefore as the concentration of AgCl (thus the concentration of Ag+) increased, then so would the concentration of Cl-.
 
  • #14
Actually you can think about it as if AgCl dissolves before Ag+ is being reduced. And solubility product plays an important role.
 
  • #15
So how does a higher concentration of AgCl make for a lower concentration of Cl-? Please just explain
 
  • #16
No such thing as "higher concentration of AgCl" - AgCl is a solid, so it doesn't have concentration. However, as every weakly soluble solid it is in equilibrium with its saturated solution.

What reacts on the electrode are Ag+. AgCl is in contact with solution of chlorides. How does concentration of the Ag+ cation depend on the concentration of chlorides?
 
  • #17
The Ag+ will react with Cl- and form AgCl. So less Cl- means more Ag+
 
  • #18
And you are now on the right track. Do you see that more Cl- means less Ag+? How is that realated to cathode/anode problem?
 
  • #19
I understand
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K