Finding Combinatorial Solutions for 3 Subsets of [n]

  • Thread starter Thread starter SticksandStones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subsets
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The question involves determining the number of ways to choose three subsets, A, B, and C, from the set [n] such that A is a subset of B, and B is a subset of C. The problem is situated within combinatorial mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to calculate the number of subsets, including combinatorial expressions and summations. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of fixed versus variable sizes of the subsets. Others explore the idea of using recurrence relations to derive a general formula.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning the validity of their reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of recurrence relations, but there is no explicit consensus on a solution or approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the complexity of the problem, particularly regarding the unknown sizes of the subsets A, B, and C, and how to generalize their findings for any integer n.

SticksandStones
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
The question: How many ways are there to choose three subsets, A, B, and C of [n] that satisfy A[tex]\subseteq[/tex]B[tex]\subseteq[/tex]C?

My attempt:

Since C is the primary subset of [n] (the set upon which A and B are built) then the maximum number of ways to choose that set is based upon both n and |C| so it would be n Choose |C|. As B is a subset of C, the number of ways to make that set would be |C| Choose |B|. The same with A, with the number of ways A can exist being |B| Choose |A|. Thus the total number of ways that these three subsets can be created is n Choose |C| + |C| Choose |B| + |B| Choose |A|.


Am I right on this line of thinking or do I fail terribly at this subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SticksandStones said:
The question: How many ways are there to choose three subsets, A, B, and C of [n] that satisfy A[tex]\subseteq[/tex]B[tex]\subseteq[/tex]C?

My attempt:

Since C is the primary subset of [n] (the set upon which A and B are built) then the maximum number of ways to choose that set is based upon both n and |C| so it would be n Choose |C|. As B is a subset of C, the number of ways to make that set would be |C| Choose |B|. The same with A, with the number of ways A can exist being |B| Choose |A|. Thus the total number of ways that these three subsets can be created is n Choose |C| + |C| Choose |B| + |B| Choose |A|.


Am I right on this line of thinking or do I fail terribly at this subject?

Hi SticksandStones! :smile:

A good answer if |A| |B| and |C| are fixed (and I'm assuming you meant to type x not + :wink:) …

but if they can be anything ≤ n, then they're all unknowns, so how can you calculate them? :confused:

So … a good line of thinking … but not for this question!

Try again! :smile:
 
Hi,
Through some brute force I have found that:
Number of possibilities for C = Sum from k=1 to n of n Choose k
Number of possibilities for B = Sum from a = 1 to n of the Sum from k=1 to a of n Choose a times a Choose k.

But, I still can't figure out then what the number of possibilities for A would be. Following the same line of think that I was using to find C and B, for n = 3 I found that the number of possibilities would be 12 * 1 Choose 1 + 6 * 2 Choose 1 + 6 * 2 Choose 2 + 3 Choose 1 + 3 Choose 2 + 3 Choose 3. I must be missing something really simple because this looks like it should collapse nicely but I can't think of anyway to make it more generic to fit any number n.
 
recurrence relation?

hmm … :rolleyes:

how about a recurrence relation (a sort-of proof by induction) …

if you know Pn, then what is Pn+1? :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
hmm … :rolleyes:

how about a recurrence relation (a sort-of proof by induction) …

if you know Pn, then what is Pn+1? :smile:

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this. Can you re-word it?
 


SticksandStones said:
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this. Can you re-word it?

Yup … suppose you know the answer for n = 7 is 4661.

Now count all the ways for n = 8.

If you start with |C| = 8 (so C = the whole of [8]), then you have a relatively easy problem.

And for all the other cases, you can use the 4661 figure to hlep you.

With luck, that wiil be easy enough to give you a general technique for getting not just from P7 = 4661 to P8, but from any Pn to Pn+1.

And then you just use that equation over and over again to get from P1 to any Pn. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K