Finding Complex Antiderivatives | Guidance for Tricky Functions

Click For Summary
Finding the antiderivative of a complex function can be approached through substitution and partial fraction decomposition. A common strategy involves using the substitution u = x^2, which simplifies the integral and allows for easier manipulation. Completing the square in the radical can further aid in the process, potentially leading to a trigonometric substitution. There is discussion about whether to apply partial fraction decomposition before or after the substitution, with insights on converting dx to du. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of strategic substitutions and simplifications in tackling tricky antiderivative problems.
OmniNewton
Messages
105
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


How would one go about finding the antiderivative to this function?
5c664275712dfef070bc027353aaecd0.png


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem has been rather tricky I have tried several attempts at the solution. My one solution consists of me factoring out the x^4. Looking for some guidance please.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OmniNewton said:

Homework Statement


How would one go about finding the antiderivative to this function?
5c664275712dfef070bc027353aaecd0.png


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem has been rather tricky I have tried several attempts at the solution. My one solution consists of me factoring out the x^4. Looking for some guidance please.

Thank you!
I would start with an ordinary substitution, u = x2, and would complete the square in the radical. From there, a trig substitution seems promising.
 
Mark44 said:
I would start with an ordinary substitution, u = x2, and would complete the square in the radical. From there, a trig substitution seems promising.
OK I will work it out now thank you for the suggestion.
 
OK I gave your suggestion an attempt.
I've arrived at the following after the substitution from x ---> u completing the square----> and back to x.

(x^4-1)
x^2((x^2+1/4)^2+ (3/4)))^(1/2)
 
Where is the point in substituting back before integration?
u=x^2+1/2 (not 1/4) was my first idea as well, but then you still have an ugly sqrt(u) in the denominator.
 
if you let u= x^2+(1/2) I also have a hard time figuring out how to remove the dx and convert it to du if du= 2x
 
That's where the sqrt(u-1/2) comes in. Forgot the 1/2 in the previous post.
Hmm, u=x^2 is an easier substitution. The initial square root goes away anyway.

Thinking about it... standard partial fraction decomposition should work, with imaginary numbers to have the zero.
 
mfb said:
That's where the sqrt(u-1/2) comes in. Forgot the 1/2 in the previous post.
Hmm, u=x^2 is an easier substitution. The initial square root goes away anyway.

Thinking about it... standard partial fraction decomposition should work.

Should i apply partial fraction before or after u substitution. Also sorry for still not getting it but when I u substitute I'm still having a hard time figuring out how to change the integral from being with respect to x to respect to u.
 
Well, if u=x2, then x=+-sqrt(u) and du = 2x dx.

Partial fraction decomposition would be without substitution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K