Contour integration around a complex pole

  • #1
57
4
Homework Statement
Prove that $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-i \alpha x}}{(x-a)^2+b^2 }dx=(pi/b) e^{-i \alpha a}e^{-b |a|}$$ via contour integration
Relevant Equations
Cauchy's integral $$\int_{C} \frac{f(z)}{z-z_0} dz= 2 \pi i f(z_0)$$ given C a closed curve and f(z) analytic over this curve.
Residue theorem might be useful.
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-i \alpha x}}{(x-a)^2+b^2}dx=(\pi/b) e^{-i \alpha a}e^{-b |a|}$$
So...this problem is important in wave propagation physics, I'm reading a book about it and it caught me by surprise.
The generalized complex integral would be
$$\int_{C} \frac{e^{-i \alpha z}}{(z-a)^2+b^2}dz$$
I am having trouble with several things, one of them is how to define the actual curve, I imagined a conterclockwise semicircle with a keyhole on the complex pole a+ib (from -R to -epsi, upwards from -epsi to ib, semicircle from -epsi + ib to epsi +ib, downwards from epsi+ib to epsi, epsi to R, and another semicircle connecting R and -R) , I haven't been able to find much info on curves around complex poles.
Second problem I am having is that even for the first segment, I cannot for the life of me solve this integral, I tried some help with a computer and the expression involves more integrals, I do not know (and I don't think) it has an antiderivative.

Maybe there's some manipulation that I can do to take advantage of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem? maybe a variable change t=z-a might make this possible. (But given the exponential maybe one of the residues will not be zero...)

I am not looking for a full answer, but rather a good direction to take this problem to...I've been out of tune with these techniques for a while.

Thanks for your attention
 
  • #2
Contour integration is the correct approach.

The poles are at [itex]z = a \pm ib[/itex].

If [itex]b \neq 0[/itex] then the poles are not on the real axis, so one part of the contour is [tex]
C_1 = \{z = x : x \in [-R,R]\}[/tex] traversed from [itex]-R[/itex] to [itex]R[/itex]. The other is a semicircle [tex]C_2 = \{z = Re^{i\theta} \}[/tex] traversed from [itex]R[/itex] to [itex]-R[/itex]. Whether this contour in the upper ([itex]\theta \in [0, \pi][/itex]) or lower ([itex]\theta \in [-\pi,0][/itex]) half-plane depends on the sign of [itex]\alpha[/itex]: You need [tex]\sup_{\theta}
\left|\frac{e^{i\alpha Re^{i\theta}}}{(Re^{i\theta} - a)^2 + b^2}iRe^{i\theta}\right| \to 0 [/tex] as [itex]R \to \infty[/itex].

Thus the contour only ever encloses one of the poles. You then have that [tex]
\int_{C_1} f(z)\,dz + \int_{C_2} f(z)\,dz = \pm 2\pi i \mathrm{Res}(z_0)[/tex] where [itex]z_0[/itex] is the pole lying inside the contour. If the contour is closed in the upper half plane then the plus sign is taken as the contour is traversed anticlockwise; otherwise the minus sign is taken as the contour is traversed clockwise. Taking the limit [itex]R \to \infty[/itex] and using the bound [tex]
\left| \int_C f(z)\,dz \right| \leq L(C) \sup \{ |f(z)| : z \in C\}[/tex]
where [itex]L(C)[/itex] is the length of the contour [itex]C[/itex] you should find that the integral over [itex]C_2[/itex] tends to zero whilst the integral over [itex]C_1[/itex] is the integral you want.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Perfect, thank you, I had never dealt with exponentials in the numerator doing residue theorem, this was very helpful, especially for inverse Fourier transforms!
 

Suggested for: Contour integration around a complex pole

Replies
3
Views
480
Replies
5
Views
642
Replies
1
Views
482
Replies
28
Views
770
Replies
5
Views
311
Replies
5
Views
341
Replies
7
Views
725
Back
Top