MHB Finding Concavity: What is the Value of t for a Concave Upward Curve?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To determine the value of t for a concave upward curve, the second derivative of y with respect to x, d^2y/dx^2, must be positive. The first derivatives are correctly calculated as dy/dx = (2t - 1) / (3t^2). The confusion arises from the differentiation process; using the quotient rule is essential for finding the second derivative. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clear notation and proper application of differentiation rules, particularly when applying the chain rule. Ultimately, the goal is to find the conditions under which the second derivative indicates concavity.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Find dy/dx and d^2y/dx^2. For which value of t is the curve concave upward?

$$x = t^3 + 1$$
$$y = t^2 - t$$

Here is what I have so far and where I got stuck.

$x' = 3t^2$
$y' = 2t - 1$

$$
\frac{2t - 1}{3t^2} /9t^4 = \frac{2t - 1}{3t^2} * \frac{1}{9t^4}$$

I'm confused. Am I doing this correctly? I took the derivative of x and y and then did y' / x' / (x')^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would use clear notation to indicate what you are doing. We may use the chain rule as follows:

$$\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{dy}{dt}\cdot\frac{dt}{dx}$$

Now, as you found:

$$\frac{dy}{dt}=2t-1$$

$$\frac{dx}{dt}=3t^2$$

Hence:

$$\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{2t-1}{3t^2}$$

Now differentiate again with respect to $x$, carefully applying the quotient, power and chain rules. What do you find?
 
Why did you divide by (x')^2?
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K