MHB Finding Coordinates on a circle with time/speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter bsmithysmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Coordinates
bsmithysmith
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Marla is running clockwise around a circular track. She runs at a constant speed of 3 meters per second. She takes 46 seconds to complete one lap of the track. From her starting point, it takes her 12 seconds to reach the northernmost point of the track. Impose a coordinate system with the center of the track at the origin, and the northernmost point on the positive y-axis. [UW]
a) Give Marla’s coordinates at her starting point.
b) Give Marla’s coordinates when she has been running for 10 seconds.
c) Give Marla’s coordinates when she has been running for 901.3 seconds.


So from what I understand, it's 3 meters/second and it takes 46 seconds to complete a lap, so $$46*3 = 138 meters$$ and then it's a circle, so 1 revolution is $$138/2Pi$$, giving the radius as approximately 21.96. From there, I have no idea what to do. I'm thinking angular speed $$(w = distance/time)$$ and linear speed $$(v = arclength/time)$$ although I think the linear speed is given as 3 meters/second, so angular speed is $$w = (21.96*theta)/seconds$$. The teacher did this in class but sadly his back was towards me the entire time so I got nothing from class that day. (Crying)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Like you, the first thing I would do is find the radius of the track:

$$3\cdot46=2\pi r\implies r=\frac{69}{\pi}$$

I would then consider a parametric description of her position on the track. A parametric description of a circle of radius $r$ is:

$$x=r\cos\left(\theta_0+\omega t \right)$$

$$y=r\sin\left(\theta_0+\omega t \right)$$

Since Marla is running in a clockwise direction, we want to negate the parameter $t$. Also, we are told the period in seconds is 46, hence:

$$\omega=\frac{2\pi}{46}=\frac{\pi}{23}$$

So now we have:

$$x=r\cos\left(\theta_0-\frac{\pi}{23}t \right)$$

$$y=r\sin\left(\theta_0-\frac{\pi}{23}t \right)$$

Now, we need to determine the initial angle $\theta_0$. We are tole she is 12 seconds from:

$$\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}$$

$$\theta_0-\frac{12\pi}{23}=\frac{\pi}{2}$$

$$\theta_0=\frac{\pi}{2}+\frac{12\pi}{23}=\frac{47}{46}\pi$$

And so we have:

$$x=r\cos\left(\frac{47}{46}\pi-\frac{\pi}{23}t \right)$$

$$y=r\sin\left(\frac{47}{46}\pi-\frac{\pi}{23}t \right)$$

Using the value we found for $r$ and rewriting the arguments for the trig. functions by factoring, we may state:

$$x=\frac{69}{\pi}\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{46}\left(47-2t \right) \right)$$

$$y=\frac{69}{\pi}\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{46}\left(47-2t \right) \right)$$
 
MarkFL said:
$$x=r\cos\left(\theta_0+\omega t \right)$$

$$y=r\sin\left(\theta_0+\omega t \right)$$

This part was confusing. The theta looks like it has a zero subscript and the omega, which is theta/time, is multiplied by time again? Sorry to ask a lot of questions; I'd really like to understand the problem more.
 
$\theta_0$ represents the initial angle (when $t=0$) and $\omega$ represents the angular speed in radians per second. It determines the period of the parametric functions. If $T$ is the given period, then we know:

$$\omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top