Finding current and charge in a RC circuit.

U.Renko
Messages
56
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A resistor with resistance R and a capacitor with capacitance C are connected in series to a direct current battery ε.
find the current and charge on the circuit as function of time.

it looks more like a review of differential equations, so I'm not really sure if I should post here or in the calculus forum...feel free to move it if you think it's better.

Homework Equations



potential at resistor: [itex]V_r = Ri[/itex]

potential at capacitor:[itex]V_c = \frac{q}{C}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Applying one of the Kirchhoff's law:
[itex]\epsilon - Ri - \frac{q}{C} = 0[/itex]
[itex]\epsilon = Ri +\frac{q}{C}[/itex]
since [itex]i = \frac{dq}{dt}[/itex] we can rewrite the equation as

[itex]\frac{\epsilon}{R} = \frac{dq}{dt} + \frac{q}{RC}[/itex] and solve with an integration factor [itex]e^{\frac{t}{RC}}[/itex]
so we have:
[itex]\frac{\epsilon}{R} e^{\frac{t}{RC}} = \frac{d}{dt}(q e^{\frac{t}{RC}})[/itex]
and then:

[itex]\int \frac{\epsilon}{R} e^{\frac{t}{RC}} dt = q e^{\frac{t}{RC}}[/itex]


here I'm kinda stuck:
because the problem did not give any initial conditions, should I just solve an indefinite integral or integrate from zero to an arbitrary t??

also: [itex]q e^{\frac{t}{RC}}[/itex] comes from integrating [itex]\int_{a}^{b} \frac{d}{dt}(q e^{\frac{t}{RC}})dt[/itex] and applying the fundamental theorem of calculus.
However, don't I need the values a and b to properly use it?
 
on Phys.org
The resistor and capacitor are connected in series to a battery. You can count the time from the instant when you close the circuit. At that instant you can assume zero charge on the capacitor, if it is not stated otherwise.

The differential equation for q is correct,

[tex]\frac{\epsilon}{R} = \frac{dq}{dt} + \frac{q}{RC}[/tex]

Solve for q(t) with the initial condition q(0)=0. ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
hmm let's see:

[itex]\int_{0}^{t} \frac{\epsilon}{R}e^{\frac{t}{RC}}dt = qe^{\frac{t}{RC}[/itex]
solving the left hand side by substitution gives:
[itex]C\epsilon\left(e^{\frac{t}{RC} -1 \right) = qe^{\frac{t}{RC}[/itex]
and so:

[itex]q(t)= e^{\frac{-t}{RC}C\epsilon\left(e^{\frac{t}{RC} -1 \right)[/itex]

[itex]q(t)= C\epsilon\left(1-e^{\frac{-t}{RC} \right)[/itex]
and
[itex]i(t) = \frac{\epsilon}{R}e^{\frac{-t}{RC}[/itex]

is that correct?
 
Last edited:
U.Renko said:
hmm let's see:

$$\int_{0}^{t} \frac {\epsilon}{R} e^{\frac{t}{RC}}dt = q e^{\frac{t}{RC}}$$
solving the left hand side by substitution gives:
$$C\epsilon \left (e^{\frac{t}{RC}} -1 \right) = qe^{\frac{t}{RC}}$$
and so:

$$q(t)= e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}C\epsilon \left (e^{\frac{t}{RC}} -1 \right)$$

$$q(t)= C \epsilon \left(1-e^{\frac{-t}{RC}} \right)$$
and
$$i(t) = \frac {\epsilon}{R}e^{\frac {-t}{RC}}$$

is that correct?

Made some corrections. Are these the equations you meant?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
And if so, then yes, you are correct.
 
yes, that is what I meant.

I honestly don't know where I messed up with the LaTeX though...
 
U.Renko said:
yes, that is what I meant.

I honestly don't know where I messed up with the LaTeX though...

Just missed a few brackets here and there. That's enough to break it though haha
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K