Finding d/dx Given d/dr and a Change of Variable

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter M. next
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Variable
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of a variable with respect to another, specifically finding d/dx given d/dr through a change of variable where x is defined as r squared. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and the application of the chain rule in calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that d/dr can be expressed as (d/dx)*(dx/dr) and suggests that dx/dr equals 2r.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of this application of the chain rule but suggests a different notation for clarity.
  • A third participant expresses doubt regarding the absence of a radical 2 in the differentiation process, recalling it from class.
  • A subsequent reply questions the origin of the radical 2, indicating uncertainty about its relevance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the application of the chain rule, but there is uncertainty regarding the presence of a radical 2 in the differentiation process, indicating unresolved disagreement.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not clarify the assumptions behind the presence of the radical 2, nor does it resolve the mathematical steps leading to the differentiation.

M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
let x=r^2.
if we have already d/dr, how to find d/dx?

I was saying, d/dr=(d/dx)*(dx/dr)=(d/dx)*2r ?

But am doubting it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi M. next! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
M. next said:
I was saying, d/dr=(d/dx)*(dx/dr)=(d/dx)*2r ?

Yes, that's a correct use of the chain rule, it's fine. :smile:

(though i'd write it 2r*dr/dx, to leave the d/dx free to have-a-go at the next thing! :wink:)
 
Thanks Tim :) but my doubting results from.. Well, I recall from class that there was a radical 2 and not only 2?
 
√2 ?

i can't think where that would come from :confused:
 
Neither could I, thanks tim,
have a good day
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K