Finding deceleration of a moving train

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the minimum deceleration required for a train to stop before hitting a car on the tracks. It is situated in the context of kinematics, specifically addressing motion under constant acceleration and the effects of reaction time.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinematics equations to find deceleration, with some questioning the appropriateness of their chosen variables, particularly time and distance. There is also consideration of whether to factor in the final velocity of the train upon stopping.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and reasoning based on the initial conditions and reaction time, while others express uncertainty about the correctness of their answers. There is an ongoing exploration of how to interpret the results, particularly regarding the sign of the acceleration value.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the distance the train travels during the engineer's reaction time, as well as the implications of using magnitudes versus signed values in their final answers.

garcia1
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An engineer in a locomotive sees a car stuck
on the track at a railroad crossing in front of
the train. When the engineer first sees the
car, the locomotive is 250 m from the crossing
and its speed is 12 m/s.
If the engineer’s reaction time is 0.36 s,
what should be the magnitude of the mini-
mum deceleration to avoid an accident?
Answer in units of m/s2.


Homework Equations



I used the kinematics equation x = volt + 1/2at^2 to find my answer.

The Attempt at a Solution



By solving for a, I got the answer 3791.358 m/s^2. This was wrong, and I'm also confused as to whether it should be a positive or negative answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garcia1 said:
I used the kinematics equation x = volt + 1/2at^2 to find my answer.

What did you use for t? It should be the maximum possible t such that the train doesn't hit the car, but this value is hard to compute.
 
I used the .36s reaction time, but i see how this is wrong now. Should I be finding the final velocity of the train when the engineer hits the breaks? Is it even necessary to find this time if I can assume that the final velocity of the whole problem would be zero, since the train would stop?
 
garcia1 said:
I used the .36s reaction time, but i see how this is wrong now. Should I be finding the final velocity of the train when the engineer hits the breaks? Is it even necessary to find this time if I can assume that the final velocity of the whole problem would be zero, since the train would stop?

Find the total distance over which braking can occur (the train keeps moving at its initial velocity during the engineer's reaction period). The train must go from its initial velocity to zero in that distance. You probably know a formula that relates initial and final velocities with acceleration and distance...:wink:
 
So I did do that through this rationale:

x = volt (since a = 0, the rest of this equation cancels out)

Solving for this, x = 12*.36, I got 4.32m.

From here, I subtracted this from the initial distance, 250m, to yield 245.68m.

With the new distance, I calculated the acceleration by using the final velocity as 0m/s, with the following equation:

Vf^2 = Vo^2 + 2a(x - xo)

Vf = 0, Vo = 12, x = 245.68, and xo = 0

I solved for a, getting -.29 m/s^2.
I used the answer +.29 m/s^2 since the problem asks for the magnitude. Does this seem right, or should I be using the negative answer as is for this problem?
 
garcia1 said:
I solved for a, getting -.29 m/s^2.
I used the answer +.29 m/s^2 since the problem asks for the magnitude. Does this seem right, or should I be using the negative answer as is for this problem?

Magnitudes are always positive. You're fine.
 
I don't know, this answer still came up wrong on my homework, but it seems like this is the way to do it.
 
garcia1 said:
I don't know, this answer still came up wrong on my homework, but it seems like this is the way to do it.

0.29 m/s2 looks like the correct answer to me. Even the significant figures match those for the given values.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K