How to find the distance between two decelerating trains?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eclair_de_XII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trains
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two trains moving towards each other and decelerating, with the goal of determining their separation when both have stopped. The context includes kinematics and the use of velocity and displacement equations based on time.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations of motion for both trains, questioning the accuracy of the acceleration values and the resulting velocities. There is exploration of using velocity graphs to determine distances traveled, along with considerations of how to integrate these graphs to find displacement.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using velocity graphs and integration to find displacements, while others are still clarifying their understanding of the equations and the initial conditions of the problem. There is an acknowledgment of confusion regarding the calculations and the setup of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the initial distance of 200 m between the trains and question how this distance affects the calculations of their final separation. There is also mention of potential errors in the acceleration values and the implications of starting distances on the final answer.

Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91

Homework Statement


"As two trains move along a track, their conductors suddenly notice that the are headed toward each other. Figure 2-28 gives their velocities as functions of time t as the conductors slow th trains. The figure's vertical scaling is set by vs = 40.0 m/s. The slowing processes begin when the trains are 200 m apart. What is their separation when both trains have stopped?"
OwLXLLe.png

Homework Equations


x - x0 = v0t + ½at2
v0A = 40 m/s
aA = -0.8 m/s2
v0B = -30 m/s
aA = 0.75 m/s2
Answer from textbook: 40 m

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I listed all the equations for the movement of the trains.
##v_A(t) = -\frac{4}{5}t+40##
##s_A(t) = -\frac{2}{5}t^2+40t##
##v_B(t) = \frac{3}{4}t-30##
##s_B(t) = \frac{3}{8}t^2-30t##

Plugging in the appropriate times...
##s_A(5) = -10+200 = 190##
##s_B(4) = 6-120 = -114##

Adding them together, I do not get the answer listed in the book.
##s_A(5) + s_B(4) = 76 m ≠ 40m##

Though there are two very peculiar things I noticed with the velocity equations. When I set them to zero:
##0 = -\frac{4}{5}t+40##
##-40 = -\frac{4}{5}t##
##-40 = -\frac{4}{5}t##
##t = 50 s##

##0 = \frac{3}{4}t-30##
##30 = \frac{3}{4}t##
##t = 40s##

Those are clearly not the values depicted in Figure 2-28. I may be wrong, but these velocity equations may have two different constants. Anyway, the second thing; when I set both displacements to (4), I somehow end up with the correct answer, despite the fact that train A doesn't stop at 4 seconds.

##s_A(4) = -6.4+160 = 153.6##
##s_B(4) = 6-120 = -114##

Adding them together (not subtracting like in the previous operation),

##s_A(4) + s_B(4) = 39.6 = 40 m##

Overall, I'm very confused on how to do such a simple problem, and at this point, I'm just messing with numbers until I get the correct answer. I feel it's very inefficient, and there must be a better way of learning. Anyway, I don't understand this problem at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eclair_de_XII said:
##v_A(t) = -\frac{4}{5}t+40##
If I put ##t = 5## in that equation, I do not get ##v_A = 0##.
 
Check your acceleration values. I don't believe they are correct (off by a factor of 10?)

An easier approach to this problem would be to use the velocity graphs directly to get the distances traveled. Have you studied how to get the displacement from a velocity versus time graph?
 
DrClaude said:
If I put t=5t = 5 in that equation, I do not get vA=0v_A = 0.

I cannot believe I overlooked such a simple error.
##v_0A = 40 m/s##
##a_A = -8 m/s##
##v_0B = -30 m/s##
##a_B = 7.5 m/s##

##v_A(t) = -8t + 40##
##s_A(t) = -4t^2+40t##
##v_B(t) = 7.5t -30##
##s_B(t) = 3.75t^2-30t##

##s_A(5) = -4(25)+40(5) = -100+200=100##
##s_B(4) = 3.75(16)-30(4) = 60 - 120 = -60##

##s_A(5) + s_B(4) = 40 m##

TSny said:
An easier approach to this problem would be to use the velocity graphs directly to get the distances traveled. Have you studied how to get the displacement from a velocity versus time graph?

Don't I just take the areas under the graphs through integration and add them together?
##A_A = \frac{1}{2}5(40) = 100 m##
##A_B = \frac{1}{2}4(-30) = -60 m##
##A_A + A_B = 40 m##
 
Eclair_de_XII said:
Don't I just take the areas under the graphs through integration and add them together?
##A_A = \frac{1}{2}5(40) = 100 m##
##A_B = \frac{1}{2}4(-30) = -60 m##
Yes.
##A_A + A_B = 40 m##
I don't understand why you are adding the displacements. Did you take into account that the trains started 200 m apart? Would your answer change if they started 300 m apart?
 
Oh. I guess the absolute values of the two integrations represent how much distance is closed between them, and the distance remaining is their initial distance apart minus that?

##200-(A_A-A_B)=40m##
 
Yes, that looks good.
 
Thank you so much.

You guys have been a big help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K