Finding determinant of Vandermonde matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter strugglinginmat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the determinant of a Vandermonde matrix and generalizing the solution for an n x n matrix. A suggested approach involves using Laplace expansion after eliminating a row or column. The determinant is identified as a polynomial V(x) of degree (n-1), with roots corresponding to the values of the Vandermonde determinant. The formula for the determinant is expressed as a product of differences between the elements, with a constant factor C, which is shown to equal 1 through induction. Overall, the conversation provides insights into both the formula and proof for the determinant of the Vandermonde matrix.
strugglinginmat
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help with finding the determinant of vandermonde matrix or the way in which I can start the problem. I did with 4X4 matrix but I would have to show that the generalisation that I get works for nXn matrix. Please anyone
 
Physics news on Phys.org
strugglinginmat said:
Can anyone help with finding the determinant of vandermonde matrix or the way in which I can start the problem. I did with 4X4 matrix but I would have to show that the generalisation that I get works for nXn matrix. Please anyone

It's a bit too messy to write down right now, but try to eliminate a row/column up to a single non-zero member and use Laplace expansion on that row/column and see where it gets you.
 
This Wikipedia article might help.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandermonde_matrix

The formula is given, but a proof is not given.

To prove the formula given in the article, replace the ith row by

1 x x^2 ... x^(n-1)

Then, take the determinant. The determinant is a function of x. Let's call it
V(x).

It is a polynomial in x of degree (n-1). Hence, it has (n-1) roots. Furthermore, V(a_i) is the value of the vandermonde determinant, and you know that letting x=a_j for any j between 1 and n(excluding i) makes the determinant 0. Hence, a_i is a root of the polynomial V(x). Thus, (a_i - a_j) is a factor in the expansion of V(a_i). Repeating this with each of the i rows tells us that that

det(V)= C product (a_j - a_i), where the product is taken over 1<=i<j<=n. C is a constant. The fact that C=1 follows from induction. To show that C=1, just consider the cofactor expansion along the last column and examine the coefficient of the highest power of a_n. This is again a vandermonde determinant. Hence, C is the same constant as the smaller Vandermonde determinant. Of course, you need to check that in the case n=2 that C=1.

Hope that was clear. I didn't write the solution super carefully, but the ideas are all there... Let me know if it made sense...
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K