Finding efficiency between transformers.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of a transformer with equal turns in the primary and secondary coils, where the primary coil produces 2.988 V and the secondary only 0.0551 V, resulting in a calculated efficiency of 1.84%. This low efficiency is attributed to the lack of an iron core, which weakens the coupling between the coils. In a separate trial with an iron core, the efficiency improved to 60.4%, indicating that the core significantly enhances performance. The participants emphasize that without the iron core, the transformer operates inefficiently due to poor magnetic coupling. Overall, the presence of the iron core is crucial for improving transformer efficiency.
Crusaderking1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Ok, I have a primary and secondary coil. I set up a transformer between them. Each has 400 turns of coil(N). The primary coil produces a potential difference of 2.988 V. The secondary coil has a potential difference of 0.0551 V.

For the efficiency, I used the equation (Np*Vs)/(Ns*Vp) * 100%

Np-turns of primary coil(400)
Vs- potential difference of secondary coil(0.0551)
Ns- turns of secondary coil(400)
Vp-potential difference of primary coil(2.988)

When I plug them in, I get 1.84% efficiency.

Am I messing the formula up, plugging in the wrong values. etc?
1.84% seems awfully low.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For equal number of turns on the primary and secondary, a 100% efficient transformer would have equal voltages on the primary and secondary. But the problem statement does give an awfully low value for the secondary voltage, namely 1.84% of the primary voltage.

Perhaps if you can you post the question in its exact wording, I can see if there is something we are missing.
 
This was a lab experiment, and these values were measured or given. the two coils were set up with an iron core and were faced toward each other with 2 voltage probes acting as a voltmeter.

Later on for a separate trial, we had the iron core placed right through the transformer with still two 400 coils, and then I calculated a reasonable 60.4% efficiency using the same formula as earlier.

I'm guessing that its a possibility that the more O-shaped iron core involved, the more efficient the transformer was, and that having no O-shaped iron core made it extremely, yet unbelievably, inefficient.
 
Okay, it makes more sense now. Without the iron core in place, the coils are not coupled as strongly to one another.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K