Finding efficiency between transformers.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the efficiency of a transformer setup with primary and secondary coils, each having 400 turns. The primary coil generates a potential difference of 2.988 V, while the secondary coil produces only 0.0551 V, resulting in an efficiency calculation of 1.84%. This low efficiency is attributed to the absence of an O-shaped iron core, which enhances magnetic coupling between the coils. A subsequent trial with the iron core yielded a significantly improved efficiency of 60.4%, confirming the critical role of core design in transformer performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformer principles and operation
  • Familiarity with efficiency calculations in electrical systems
  • Knowledge of magnetic coupling and its impact on transformer performance
  • Experience with measuring voltage in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of core materials on transformer efficiency
  • Learn about different transformer designs and their applications
  • Study the principles of electromagnetic induction
  • Explore advanced transformer efficiency calculations and optimization techniques
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in designing or analyzing transformer systems will benefit from this discussion.

Crusaderking1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Ok, I have a primary and secondary coil. I set up a transformer between them. Each has 400 turns of coil(N). The primary coil produces a potential difference of 2.988 V. The secondary coil has a potential difference of 0.0551 V.

For the efficiency, I used the equation (Np*Vs)/(Ns*Vp) * 100%

Np-turns of primary coil(400)
Vs- potential difference of secondary coil(0.0551)
Ns- turns of secondary coil(400)
Vp-potential difference of primary coil(2.988)

When I plug them in, I get 1.84% efficiency.

Am I messing the formula up, plugging in the wrong values. etc?
1.84% seems awfully low.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For equal number of turns on the primary and secondary, a 100% efficient transformer would have equal voltages on the primary and secondary. But the problem statement does give an awfully low value for the secondary voltage, namely 1.84% of the primary voltage.

Perhaps if you can you post the question in its exact wording, I can see if there is something we are missing.
 
This was a lab experiment, and these values were measured or given. the two coils were set up with an iron core and were faced toward each other with 2 voltage probes acting as a voltmeter.

Later on for a separate trial, we had the iron core placed right through the transformer with still two 400 coils, and then I calculated a reasonable 60.4% efficiency using the same formula as earlier.

I'm guessing that its a possibility that the more O-shaped iron core involved, the more efficient the transformer was, and that having no O-shaped iron core made it extremely, yet unbelievably, inefficient.
 
Okay, it makes more sense now. Without the iron core in place, the coils are not coupled as strongly to one another.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K