Finding electric flux using Gauss' Law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on calculating electric flux using Gauss' Law for a hollow conducting cylinder with an open end, containing a positive charge Q at its center. Participants confirm that while Gauss' Law requires a closed surface, one can still compute the flux through the closed end by integrating the electric field E over that surface. The electric field can be derived using Coulomb's Law, and the flux is expressed as Φ = ∫∫_S E·dS. The complexity arises from the conducting nature of the cylinder, which alters the electric field distribution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law and its application in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's Law for calculating electric fields
  • Knowledge of electric flux and its mathematical representation
  • Concept of Gaussian surfaces in electrostatic problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields using Coulomb's Law in various geometries
  • Explore advanced applications of Gauss' Law in non-trivial geometries
  • Learn about the method of images for solving electrostatic problems
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving electrostatic equations in complex configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in advanced applications of Gauss' Law and electric field calculations.

Wrichik Basu
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
2,690
Say you have a hollow cylinder, whose one side is open. Now, you pace a positive charge ##Q## at the centre of this open end (such that it is just inside the cylinder). How much should be the flux coming out from the closed end?

I just thought of this problem. In order to use Gauss' Law, we need a closed surface. Can any such imaginary closed surface be constructed in this case? In short, will any flux be coming out of the closed end?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hollow conducting cylinder ? Height/diameter >> 1 ? Not grounded, I presume ?

Wrichik Basu said:
Can any such imaginary closed surface be constructed in this case?
Any closed surface is a Gaussian surface, so: yes!
Wrichik Basu said:
In short, will any flux be coming out of the closed end?
" In short " meaning "the same question in other words"?

As a completely diffferent question: yes.

PLease share your thoughts, just like if this were a homework exercise ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Simon Bridge
Wrichik Basu said:
How much should be the flux coming out from the closed end?
You know the electric field from a point charge, so just integrate that over the closed end to get the flux.
 
BvU said:
Hollow conducting cylinder ? Height/diameter >> 1 ? Not grounded, I presume ?Any closed surface is a Gaussian surface, so: yes!
" In short " meaning "the same question in other words"?

As a completely diffferent question: yes.

PLease share your thoughts, just like if this were a homework exercise ...
Let me clear it up a bit. Sorry for the confusing terminology.

Yes, it is a conducting cylinder. Both height and diameter are >> 1, and it is not grounded.

What I wanted to say was, since the cylinder had one side open, could I use Gauss' Law to compute the electric flux on the closed end? Gauss' Law requires a closed surface to be constructed in order to find the flux. How do I construct the closed surface so that I can compute the flux on the closed end of the cylinder?

But @Dale has given a solution of not going to Gauss' Law in this case, and thanks for that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Dale said:
You know the electric field from a point charge, so just integrate that over the closed end to get the flux.
Could you elaborate ?
 
BvU said:
Could you elaborate ?
The flux is ##\Phi=\int\int_S E\cdot dS##. Since you know E (Coulombs law) and S (end of cylinder) you can just directly calculate ##\Phi## without using Gauss’ law
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
How does one find ##\vec E\;## for such a configuration ?
 
Wrichik Basu said:
Say you have a hollow cylinder, whose one side is open. Now, you pace a positive charge ##Q## at the centre of this open end (such that it is just inside the cylinder). How much should be the flux coming out from the closed end?

I just thought of this problem. In order to use Gauss' Law, we need a closed surface. Can any such imaginary closed surface be constructed in this case? In short, will any flux be coming out of the closed end?

This appears to be nothing more than the problem of a point charged enclosed in a cylindrical Gaussian surface, is it not? All you are interested in is the electric flux passing through the surface at one end of the cylinder.

Zz.
 
BvU said:
How does one find ##\vec E\;## for such a configuration ?
Coulomb’s law

Edit: oops, I see now that the cylinder is not just a partial Gaussian surface, but an actual conductor.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
ZapperZ said:
This appears to be nothing more than the problem of a point charge enclosed in a cylindrical Gaussian surface, is it not? All you are interested in is the electric flux passing through the surface at one end of the cylinder.
Zz.
That is what we call the problem statement in the homework fora. 'nothing more' and 'enclosed' appears misplaced to me. I am curious to find a handle to work out a solution. Does not seem trivial at all to me

upload_2018-6-24_18-14-11.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-6-24_18-14-11.png
    upload_2018-6-24_18-14-11.png
    699 bytes · Views: 893
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
  • #11
BvU said:
That is what we call the problem statement in the homework fora. 'nothing more' and 'enclosed' appears misplaced to me. I am curious to find a handle to work out a solution. Does not seem trivial at all to me

View attachment 227263
Thanks for the diagram, I meant that.
 
  • #12
ZapperZ said:
This appears to be nothing more than the problem of a point charged enclosed in a cylindrical Gaussian surface, is it not? All you are interested in is the electric flux passing through the surface at one end of the cylinder.

Zz.
As per the diagram given by @BvU, one side of the cylinder is open. That's where the problem lies.
 
  • #13
Wrichik Basu said:
As per the diagram given by @BvU, one side of the cylinder is open. That's where the problem lies.

Why would this matter? You wanted the flux that goes through the other end. The only thing that matters is how far away that surface is, and its surface area.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
  • #14
Would the ##\vec E \;## field be distorted by the conducting can in such a way that the flux through the bottom is the same as in the case the can isn't there ?
 
  • #15
BvU said:
Would the ##\vec E \;## field be distorted by the conducting can in such a way that the flux through the bottom is the same as in the case the can isn't there ?
It would be distorted, because in the case where there isn’t a can the E field is purely radial, but in the case where there is a can the field must be perpendicular to the surface of the can.

If it were a flat box then I would use the method of images, but in this case I would need to numerically solve the electrostatic equations. There might be a more elegant method, but I don’t know it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K