Finding energy of an electron analytically

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter foota
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The energy of an electron in a given orbital can be approximated by solving the Schrödinger equation, but this is analytically feasible only for hydrogen and certain simplified models like 'harmonium'. For complex elements with multiple electrons, numerical methods are essential due to the many-body problem, which complicates finding a simple formula. Fields such as quantum chemistry and solid-state physics focus on developing better approximations and computational methods for these calculations, as no straightforward formula currently exists.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of numerical methods in physics
  • Basic principles of quantum chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research numerical methods for solving the Schrödinger equation
  • Explore quantum chemistry techniques for approximating electron energies
  • Study the many-body problem in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate advancements in solid-state physics related to electron behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, quantum chemistry, and solid-state physics, will benefit from this discussion.

foota
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How would you find the energy of an electron in a given orbital in an element? I'm pretty sure from what I understand that you could excite the electron and measure the wavelength of light given off and find the difference, but is there some formula that at least approximates this energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Formally, one may solve the Schrödinger equation. For complex elements (i.e. elements that have more than one electron present) numerical methods become necessary.
 
It can't be done analytically for anything other than hydrogen. (And some fake atoms like 'harmonium') There are approximations for helium that can be hand-calculated, but even those are either inaccurate or tedious.

There are several whole fields of science (e.g. quantum chemistry, solid-state physics) largely devoted to finding better and faster approximations of this. So obviously: no simple "formula" is known. It's a many-body problem, so there are some mathematical reasons to believe no such simple formula exists, either. (among other things, it'd likely prove P = NP) But people are developing new methods of calculating and approximating the solutions every day, as well as applying the existing methods to learning new stuff.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K