Finding Freefall Acceleration on a planet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the free-fall acceleration on a spherically symmetric planet, where the acceleration at the North Pole is defined as g = g0 and at the equator as g = λ g0, with λ between 0 and 1. The participants derive the expression for g as a function of the colatitude angle θ, resulting in the formula g = g0 √(cos²(θ) + λ² sin²(θ)). Key manipulations involve the vector addition of gravitational components and the relationship Ω² RE = (λ - 1)g0, which was scrutinized for accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational acceleration and vector addition
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and colatitude
  • Knowledge of angular velocity (Ω) and its relation to gravitational forces
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational acceleration in non-uniform fields
  • Explore the implications of angular velocity on gravitational forces
  • Learn about the effects of planetary shape on gravitational acceleration
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of trigonometric identities in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying gravitational forces, astrophysics enthusiasts, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of gravitational acceleration on non-standard planetary bodies.

B3NR4Y
Gold Member
Messages
170
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


On a certain planet, which is perfectly spherically symmetric, the free-fall acceleration has magnitude g = g0 at the North Pole and g = λ g0 at the equator (lambda is between zero and 1). Find g as a function of theta, the colatitude angle.

Homework Equations


\vec{g} = \vec{g_0} + (\Omega \times R_E ) \times \Omega

The Attempt at a Solution


The colatitude angle at the North Pole is 0 degrees, and at the equator it is 90 degrees.

I subtracted the vector g0 from both sides, to only have to deal with the magnitude of the cross product term. The magnitude of that term is Ω2 RE sin2 θ, which is equal to zero for theta equals 0, and for theta = 90 it equals lambda minus one. I'm not sure where to go from here to get what the book gives.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the book give? (I bet you knew someone was going to ask this :smile:)

How did you get the sinθ to be squared?
 
Haha I knew it!

g = g_0 \sqrt{cos^2 (\theta) + \lambda^2 sin^2 (\theta) }

I've done some manipulation using the fact that Ω2 RE = (λ-1)g0

And using the magnitude of g and manipulating it as much as possible, but that doesn't seem to be taking me anywhere
 
B3NR4Y said:
Haha I knew it!

g = g_0 \sqrt{cos^2 (\theta) + \lambda^2 sin^2 (\theta) }
OK. That expression looks correct.

I've done some manipulation using the fact that Ω2 RE = (λ-1)g0

I believe you have a sign error here. This expression would make ##\lambda > 1##, which would imply that the acceleration is greater at the equator compared to the pole.

And using the magnitude of g and manipulating it as much as possible, but that doesn't seem to be taking me anywhere
What is your expression for the magnitude of g? You first need to do the vector addition ##\vec{g}_0 + (\vec{\Omega} \times \vec{R}_E) \times \vec{ \Omega}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K