Finding Freefall Acceleration on a planet

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the free-fall acceleration on a spherically symmetric planet, where the acceleration varies with colatitude. The original poster presents a problem involving the relationship between gravitational acceleration at the poles and equator, expressed in terms of a variable λ.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational acceleration and colatitude, questioning the derivation of terms like sin²(θ) and the implications of the expression for g. There is an attempt to manipulate equations involving gravitational acceleration and angular velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing expressions for gravitational acceleration and questioning the validity of certain steps in the derivation. Some guidance has been offered regarding vector addition and potential errors in signs, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for solving the problem. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the derived expressions do not lead to contradictions, such as implying an acceleration greater at the equator than at the pole.

B3NR4Y
Gold Member
Messages
170
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


On a certain planet, which is perfectly spherically symmetric, the free-fall acceleration has magnitude g = g0 at the North Pole and g = λ g0 at the equator (lambda is between zero and 1). Find g as a function of theta, the colatitude angle.

Homework Equations


\vec{g} = \vec{g_0} + (\Omega \times R_E ) \times \Omega

The Attempt at a Solution


The colatitude angle at the North Pole is 0 degrees, and at the equator it is 90 degrees.

I subtracted the vector g0 from both sides, to only have to deal with the magnitude of the cross product term. The magnitude of that term is Ω2 RE sin2 θ, which is equal to zero for theta equals 0, and for theta = 90 it equals lambda minus one. I'm not sure where to go from here to get what the book gives.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the book give? (I bet you knew someone was going to ask this :smile:)

How did you get the sinθ to be squared?
 
Haha I knew it!

g = g_0 \sqrt{cos^2 (\theta) + \lambda^2 sin^2 (\theta) }

I've done some manipulation using the fact that Ω2 RE = (λ-1)g0

And using the magnitude of g and manipulating it as much as possible, but that doesn't seem to be taking me anywhere
 
B3NR4Y said:
Haha I knew it!

g = g_0 \sqrt{cos^2 (\theta) + \lambda^2 sin^2 (\theta) }
OK. That expression looks correct.

I've done some manipulation using the fact that Ω2 RE = (λ-1)g0

I believe you have a sign error here. This expression would make ##\lambda > 1##, which would imply that the acceleration is greater at the equator compared to the pole.

And using the magnitude of g and manipulating it as much as possible, but that doesn't seem to be taking me anywhere
What is your expression for the magnitude of g? You first need to do the vector addition ##\vec{g}_0 + (\vec{\Omega} \times \vec{R}_E) \times \vec{ \Omega}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K