Finding how long a collision lasts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ghost4512
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
In a crash test scenario, a 2000 kg truck traveling at 23 m/s collides with a concrete wall, crumpling 0.67 m. The average velocity during the collision is calculated to be 11.5 m/s, leading to questions about the time duration of the collision (Δt) and the distance traveled by the rear bumper. The discussion highlights the need to assume a constant acceleration to solve for Δt, although this assumption may not be realistic. Participants emphasize that the acceleration and speed are not constant during the collision, complicating the calculations. The conversation underscores the importance of understanding the dynamics of collisions for accurate analysis.
Ghost4512
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a crash test, a truck with mass 2000 kg traveling at 23 m/s smashes head-on into a concrete wall without rebounding. The front end crumples so much that the truck is 0.67 m shorter than before.

Homework Equations


About how long does the collision last? (That is, how long is the interval between first contact with the wall and coming to a stop?)
Δt = (c) What is the magnitude of the average force exerted by the wall on the truck during the collision?
Fwall, avg = N(d) It is interesting to compare this force to the weight of the truck. Calculate the ratio of the force of the wall to the gravitational force mg on the truck. This large ratio shows why a collision is so damaging.
[Fwall, avg]/mg =


The Attempt at a Solution


Well I figured out that the Average velocity during the collision was 11.5 m/s. But after this I am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, how far does the rear bumper travel during the collision?
 
Wouldn't it have only traveled .67 m?
 
Yes, so now can you solve for Δt?
 
Oh, duh. Thanks.
 
paisiello2 said:
Yes, so now can you solve for Δt?
Not so fast, literally.
The speed will not be constant. The acceleration will not be constant either, but you will have to assume a particular time profile for the acceleration in order to solve the problem. The questioner probably expects you to assume constant acceleration.
 
I believe the OP did this already.
 
Yep.
 
O
Ghost4512 said:
Yep.
Ok, but my point is that to do this you had to make an assumption that was not only unjustified but in practice likely to be false.
 
Back
Top